1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Svetlanka [38]
2 years ago
7

Landry owned and operated a car service station in a small village. He sold the station to Harold, agreeing not to open another

service
station for six months within an area of two miles. Three months later Landry opened a service station just five blocks from his former
location. Harold immediately commenced a court action to enforce their agreement. Landry would receive official notification of
Harold's action when Landry is served with which of the following:
An indictment
A judgment NOV.
A summons and complaint.
A subpoena.
Law
1 answer:
liberstina [14]2 years ago
8 0
A is the answer have good day
You might be interested in
What is the "employment-at-will" doctrine? What are the exceptions to this doctrine
snow_lady [41]
The three major common law exceptions are public policy, implied contract, and implied covenant of good faith. ... The most widely recognized common law exception to the at-will presumption protects employees against adverse employment actions that violate a public interest.
6 0
3 years ago
1.) If I Can’t Have You. Bertha shot and killed her husband and his lover after discovering them having $exxxx in his car. When
Hatshy [7]

Answer:

The judgement will base on the crime committed

8 0
1 year ago
To which of the following would Kant and Nozick agree?
soldier1979 [14.2K]

Answer:

Although Robert Nozick did not consider himself to be primarily a political philosopher, he is best known for his contributions to it. Undoubtedly, Nozick’s work in epistemology and metaphysics (especially with respect to free will and the “closest continuer” theory of personal identity) has had a significant impact on those fields. However, it was the publication of his first book, Anarchy, State and Utopia (1974) that revitalized the political right-wing and set off a firestorm of critical replies and commentaries. While Nozick’s accomplishments reach far beyond the confines of political philosophy, it is safe to say that most recognize him for his work on attempting to provide a justification for the state, setting the limits of government, and trying to convince us that accepting his minimal state could foster a framework for a constellation of communities constituting a sort of utopia.

Anarchy, State and Utopia can also be seen as a critical response to John Rawls’ Theory of Justice, which was published just three years earlier and was considered to be the most robust and sophisticated defense of liberal egalitarianism. Although many credit Rawls for single-handedly rekindling interest in political philosophy, this is likely overstated praise. There is little doubt that Nozick’s systematic criticism of Rawls’ theory of justice and establishment of a rival political theory in Anarchy, State and Utopia also played a major role in bring significant attention back to political philosophy.

8 0
2 years ago
Why would a police officer need to know the bill of rights?
Hunter-Best [27]

Hi!

Police officers would need to know about bill of rights so that they make sure that they are being fair during an arrest, or any other police duty. For example, the first amendment of the bill of rights states that everyone should have freedom of religion, speech and press. An officer can NOT arrest a person who is giving a speech to fellow people about how he/she feels about the nation/government, because of the first amendment.

Hope this helps! Have a wonderful day/night! :)

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the final outcome of Commonwealth vs. Albert J. Henson, Mass., 1970?
AfilCa [17]

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts (plaintiff) accused Henson of an attack by way of a risky weapon. By the end of the trial, Henson moved for a directed verdict. The trial court denied the motion, and the jury convicted Henson of attack by way of a risky weapon.

<h3>What is the meaning of trial in law?</h3>

The trial is a dependent technique wherein the information of a case is offered to a jury, and that they determine if the defendant is responsible or now no longer responsible for the price offered.

During the trial, the prosecutor makes use of witnesses and proof to show to the jury that the defendant dedicated the crime(s).

Thus,  By the end of the trial, Henson moved for a directed verdict. The trial court denied the motion, and the jury convicted Henson of attack by way of a risky weapon.

learn more about Commonwealth vs. Albert J. Henson:

brainly.com/question/27961073

#SPJ1

5 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Multiple Choice
    11·2 answers
  • Nick is a night Watchman at Eastwood Mall. He catches Freddy trying to leave a shoe shop with stolen sneakers. Catherine Freddy
    5·2 answers
  • Alcohol has many sensations and effects like:______
    15·2 answers
  • A homeowner filed a federal diversity action against the manufacturer of a pressure cooker for a products liability action based
    14·1 answer
  • Parafrasea la información del texto escogido (texto1 o texto2), es decir, usa tus propias palabras y realiza dos realice dos pár
    9·1 answer
  • Speculation, hearsay, relevance are examples<br> of valid objections.<br> True or false
    12·1 answer
  • In general, how has the power of the federal and the state governments changed over the course of the country's
    12·1 answer
  • What is a statutory instrument
    14·1 answer
  • How do registration laws very among states
    9·1 answer
  • What is the difference between republicans and democratic?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!