The correct answers to these open questions are the following.
Maple Farms, Inc. v. City School District of Elmira.
Could something like this bankrupt a company?
Yes, it can, if the proper forecast were not done taking into consideration all of the possible variables at medium and long-range.
Do you agree with the decision?
It was a tough decision because the court declared in its decision that the performance was not impracticable, as Maple Farm Inc indicated when decided to break the contract.
In strict theory, I agree with the court's decision because the explanation was that an "impractical" occurred when an event happened totally unexpected. And in this case, Mapple Farm Inc could have taken extra provisions knowing that milk had a 10% increase the last year and had the chance of more increases in the present year.
That is how a company can avoid this type of situation. Taking better provisions, contemplating all kinds of variables, knowing that in the future, something unexpected can happen and could be prevented with the proper forecast.
Answer:
(C) Partner A will have a smaller loss absorption potential than L
<span>Part of the lands' end business model includes purchasing products and then selling them again without any reprocessing. Lands' end is operating in the reseller market.
This company doesn't use the goods it has bought - it just sells it again to another company so as to get some profit.
</span>
Answer:
$400 .Since inventory is valued at cost or market value(current replacement cost) whichever is lower .
Therefore value of inventory : $400*8=$3200
Explanation:
The labor force that can be depicted from the information about the people will be 36.
<h3>How to calculate the labor force</h3>
The labor force will be:
= 25 + 8 + 3
= 36
The unemployment rate will be:
= Unemployed/Labor force × 100
= 3/36 × 100
= 8.33%
The participation rate will be:
= Labor force/Adult population × 100
= 36/(80 - 16) × 100
= 56.25%
Learn more about the labor force on:
brainly.com/question/24939447
