All categories

1 year ago

Political scientists have generally found that justices' decisions are most closely tied to:_______

1 answer:

3 0

Political scientists have generally found that justices' decisions are most closely tied to<u> </u><u>their political ideologies.</u>

It is a frequent misconception that Supreme Court justices' voting decisions primarily reflect their beliefs, principles, or personal policy preferences.

However, this supposition has never been sufficiently verified using objective assessments of the ideological beliefs of the justices, that is, assessments that are not based on their votes on the Court.

We derive independent and trustworthy measures of the values of every Supreme Court justice from Earl Warren to Anthony Kennedy using content analytic approaches.

The attitudinal paradigm is firmly supported by the close correlation between these values and the justices' votes.

To learn more about Political Scientists here

brainly.com/question/10369837

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

What are the four ways the Constitution guards against tyranny?

taurus [48]

Answer: federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and the large and small states both treated equally.

Explanation:

The Constitution guarded against tyranny in ways such as having the federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and the large and small states both treated equally.

7 0

2 years ago

_________ is a theory of social movements that assumes people join not because of the movement’s ideals but to satisfy a psychol

Aliun [14]

Answer:

Mass society theory

Explanation:

Mass society theory states that the individual which feels less valued starts believing in ideals in order to find a sense of belongingness. This happens when the individual feels helpless and are in despair.

The ideals that are followed are extreme which causes harm to the individual. Hence, the statement here is referring to Mass society theory.

7 0

2 years ago

A law that placed restrictions on courses girls could take in high school would be evaluated by the courts using the:A. reasonab

Alex Ar [27]

The correct answer is C) intermediate scrutiny test.

A law that placed restrictions on courses girls could take in high school would be evaluated by the courts using the intermediate scrutiny test.

We are talking about the kind of test the Court uses to determine the constitutionality of a statute. When the members of the Court need to make a decision, this test is a tool they have to help them decide if a statute passed by the federal government or a state affects in a negative way some protected classes such as the case of the courses girls could take in high school.

8 0

2 years ago

PLEASE HELP!!!

netineya [11]

Answer:

D: Ms. Citizen sent her elected official a letter about her flooding problem, and now the council will discuss it.

Explanation:

Well, it describes the whole letter if you read it carefully.

I hope this helps! :)

Sorry if I got it wrong.

4 0

2 years ago

Most leadership theories were developed in the United States, causing them to stress ________. both rationality and spirituality

AURORKA [14]

Answer:

rationality over spirituality

Explanation:

Hello! The United States is a country with many developed theories about leadership, which means that there was a deep-field study linked to academics. That is why rationalism is over spirituality since reasoning was used to form the theories because it considers more efficient.

Thanks for your question!

4 0

2 years ago