1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
valkas [14]
2 years ago
6

Imagine that the president has deployed forces to intervene in a civil war in the Middle East. The purpose of the deployment is

to protect the civilians in a large city from an imminent attack by their own government. The president claims that this urgent use of military force falls within the powers of the presidency as commander in chief, but does not reach the level of involvement that requires Congress to declare war. The president does not formally consult with Congress before ordering military action and does not provide a report to Congress in a timely manner.
In response, the House Armed Services Committee declares that the president violated the War Powers Act, demands that the president remove the troops, and formally brings the case to the Supreme Court to force action from the president.

You are a justice on the Supreme Court preparing to hear the case. Start by writing down your initial reactions to the situation. Based on what you know of the War Powers Act, which branch appears to be in the right? What questions would you ask during oral arguments to try to get each side to explain its point of view?














Imagine that the president has deployed forces to intervene in a civil war in the Middle East. The purpose of the deployment is to protect the civilians in a large city from an imminent attack by their own government. The president claims that this urgent use of military force falls within the powers of the presidency as commander in chief, but does not reach the level of involvement that requires Congress to declare war. The president does not formally consult with Congress before ordering military action and does not provide a report to Congress in a timely manner.

In response, the House Armed Services Committee declares that the president violated the War Powers Act, demands that the president remove the troops, and formally brings the case to the Supreme Court to force action from the president.

You are a justice on the Supreme Court preparing to hear the case. Start by writing down your initial reactions to the situation. Based on what you know of the War Powers Act, which branch appears to be in the right? What questions would you ask during oral arguments to try to get each side to explain its point of view?










Imagine that the president has deployed forces to intervene in a civil war in the Middle East. The purpose of the deployment is to protect the civilians in a large city from an imminent attack by their own government. The president claims that this urgent use of military force falls within the powers of the presidency as commander in chief, but does not reach the level of involvement that requires Congress to declare war. The president does not formally consult with Congress before ordering military action and does not provide a report to Congress in a timely manner.

In response, the House Armed Services Committee declares that the president violated the War Powers Act, demands that the president remove the troops, and formally brings the case to the Supreme Court to force action from the president.

You are a justice on the Supreme Court preparing to hear the case. Start by writing down your initial reactions to the situation. Based on what you know of the War Powers Act, which branch appears to be in the right? What questions would you ask during oral arguments to try to get each side to explain its point of view?
History
1 answer:
Ierofanga [76]2 years ago
7 0

According to the War Powers Act, the President is required to inform Congress of any military operations he plans to take within 48 hours. If the United States is attacked or seriously threatened, the President may use military action abroad with the approval of Congress and under the authority of the War Powers Act. If the President fails to inform Congress within 48 hours and get permission, the decision might be challenged and overturned. In my capacity as a judge, I must inquire of the President as to why he chose not to inform Congress of his decision.

Good questions to ask are

  • How strict is the standard of review on appeal, and what does it indicate for the scope of this court's review?
  • Where do you excel the most? When there are two or more viable bases for a ruling, which one do you hope the court will choose, and why?
  • What specific remedy are you seeking, and on what basis does the court have the power to award it?

<h3>What is oral arguments?</h3>

Generally, In a court of law, a case may be presented via oral argument.

In conclusion, For this case congress is correct.

Read more about oral arguments

brainly.com/question/15266611

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Zoom in to see will make brainliest for first who answers
nydimaria [60]

Answer:

The problem facing all humans is the fact that we have unlimited wants but we don't and can never have enough resources to satisfy these wants. This leads us to making choices thus making an opportunity cost. Opportunity cost is the cost of the forgone alternative

4 0
2 years ago
Which of the following terms of the treaty of Versailles upset the germans ​
ValentinkaMS [17]

Answer:

Um the germans hated the Versailles treaty because it basically blamed them for the war. also was the reduction in military, demilitarizing the Rhineland, and massive war reparations.

7 0
2 years ago
Who fought on the side of the republicans in the spanish civil war
Bond [772]
Anti-communist groups fascist rebel troops a professional army of international volunteers
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who is going to win the 2020 presidentical ellection
viktelen [127]

Answer:

ikr, lol

I don't about u, but I am tired of Trump being presiedent.

3 0
2 years ago
which element of the compromise of 1850 could be considered a "win" by both northerners and southerners.​
fgiga [73]

Answer:

there you go

Explanation:

North Gets                                                South Gets

California admitted as a free state           No slavery restrictions in Utah or    

                                                                               New Mexico territories

Slave trade prohibited in Washington D.C.                 Slaveholding permitted in                          Washington D.C.

Texas loses boundary dispute with New Mexico       Texas gets $10 million

                                                                                                   Fugitive Slave Law

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is it not possible, except in rare cases, to appeal a lawsuit before the lower court issues a finding?
    5·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast the reasons for settlement of Jamestown and Plymouth.
    11·2 answers
  • In 1848, rioting in Berlin forced the Prussian king Frederick William IV to promise a constitution. True or False?
    11·2 answers
  • THEODORE ROOSEVELT'S DOMESTIC POLICY WAS CALLED
    8·2 answers
  • Key clauses in the fourteen amendment match each clause to the phrase that best defines it
    11·1 answer
  • What is one reason that more people didn’t foresee the economic collapse of the 1930s
    14·2 answers
  • Which facts about lines of longitude are true
    13·2 answers
  • Prompt
    8·1 answer
  • How Did The Philosophy Of The Renaissance Humanism Differ From That Of Medieval Scholasticism?
    7·1 answer
  • Answer Asap Please!
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!