1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
valkas [14]
2 years ago
6

Imagine that the president has deployed forces to intervene in a civil war in the Middle East. The purpose of the deployment is

to protect the civilians in a large city from an imminent attack by their own government. The president claims that this urgent use of military force falls within the powers of the presidency as commander in chief, but does not reach the level of involvement that requires Congress to declare war. The president does not formally consult with Congress before ordering military action and does not provide a report to Congress in a timely manner.
In response, the House Armed Services Committee declares that the president violated the War Powers Act, demands that the president remove the troops, and formally brings the case to the Supreme Court to force action from the president.

You are a justice on the Supreme Court preparing to hear the case. Start by writing down your initial reactions to the situation. Based on what you know of the War Powers Act, which branch appears to be in the right? What questions would you ask during oral arguments to try to get each side to explain its point of view?














Imagine that the president has deployed forces to intervene in a civil war in the Middle East. The purpose of the deployment is to protect the civilians in a large city from an imminent attack by their own government. The president claims that this urgent use of military force falls within the powers of the presidency as commander in chief, but does not reach the level of involvement that requires Congress to declare war. The president does not formally consult with Congress before ordering military action and does not provide a report to Congress in a timely manner.

In response, the House Armed Services Committee declares that the president violated the War Powers Act, demands that the president remove the troops, and formally brings the case to the Supreme Court to force action from the president.

You are a justice on the Supreme Court preparing to hear the case. Start by writing down your initial reactions to the situation. Based on what you know of the War Powers Act, which branch appears to be in the right? What questions would you ask during oral arguments to try to get each side to explain its point of view?










Imagine that the president has deployed forces to intervene in a civil war in the Middle East. The purpose of the deployment is to protect the civilians in a large city from an imminent attack by their own government. The president claims that this urgent use of military force falls within the powers of the presidency as commander in chief, but does not reach the level of involvement that requires Congress to declare war. The president does not formally consult with Congress before ordering military action and does not provide a report to Congress in a timely manner.

In response, the House Armed Services Committee declares that the president violated the War Powers Act, demands that the president remove the troops, and formally brings the case to the Supreme Court to force action from the president.

You are a justice on the Supreme Court preparing to hear the case. Start by writing down your initial reactions to the situation. Based on what you know of the War Powers Act, which branch appears to be in the right? What questions would you ask during oral arguments to try to get each side to explain its point of view?
History
1 answer:
Ierofanga [76]2 years ago
7 0

According to the War Powers Act, the President is required to inform Congress of any military operations he plans to take within 48 hours. If the United States is attacked or seriously threatened, the President may use military action abroad with the approval of Congress and under the authority of the War Powers Act. If the President fails to inform Congress within 48 hours and get permission, the decision might be challenged and overturned. In my capacity as a judge, I must inquire of the President as to why he chose not to inform Congress of his decision.

Good questions to ask are

  • How strict is the standard of review on appeal, and what does it indicate for the scope of this court's review?
  • Where do you excel the most? When there are two or more viable bases for a ruling, which one do you hope the court will choose, and why?
  • What specific remedy are you seeking, and on what basis does the court have the power to award it?

<h3>What is oral arguments?</h3>

Generally, In a court of law, a case may be presented via oral argument.

In conclusion, For this case congress is correct.

Read more about oral arguments

brainly.com/question/15266611

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
After General Howe's forces defeated the Americans at Brooklyn Heights and White Plains, Washington's strategy called for
klasskru [66]
<span>He retreated to the northwest, to Manhattan, and then west to New Jersey</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Explain how the roads, paul, and constantine helped The spread of Christianity throughout the Roman empire.
Lisa [10]
The Roman empire was well organized with good roads & active trade, so the new religion could spread easily. Constantine was a sun worshipper who feigned Christianity so he could take control and throw out it's one and only goal
4 0
3 years ago
Which event occurred last?
solmaris [256]

Answer:

i think its B im not sure sorry if i get it wrong

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe the rioters plan for the gold and how it proves fatal to all three of them
Papessa [141]
In the Pardoners Tale 3 crazy young fellows, visitors of a bar, who set out to execute Death.They discover gold; one goes into town for sustenance and drink. He harms the wine. When he restores his two companions murder him and after that drink the wine. They excessively bite the dust. 
He didn't get anything's great to say in regards to them. They're the embodiment of evil. The negligible reality that they accumulate every now and again in the nearby bar is sufficient for the Pardoner to interface them to a large group of sins, including indecency, ravenousness, tipsiness, and irreverent pledge swearing.
6 0
4 years ago
What is a polling place
Kay [80]
It can be a building , like a town hall or school. usually there is one in each town, not specially for it, but for the time.
6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Switzerland managed to stay neutral during World Ww 1 and WW2
    14·1 answer
  • The u.s. bill of rights was influenced by what historical precedents
    12·1 answer
  • How did the Teddy Bear get it's name?
    10·1 answer
  • What was a principle reason for rapid economic growth in the United States during the 1920s? 
    14·2 answers
  • According to winston churchill, what was the iron curtain ?
    5·1 answer
  • What are the three main branches of Christianity
    13·1 answer
  • Hello I am doing nothing and need someone to talk to.
    13·2 answers
  • What are the main characteristics of Renaissance sculptures?
    5·2 answers
  • Did Jackson set a precedent for future presidents? Why or why not?
    5·1 answer
  • The quote below comes from the Supreme Court ruling in Mapp v. Ohio (1961):
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!