It led to division of labor
In the case,Texas v.Johnson,the texas court tried and convicted Mr.Johnson for violating the statute that prohibited the desecration of venerated objects e.g the American flag that could arouse anger in other individuals.Johnson appealed with the argument that the actions were a "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment.
Texas laws punishes actions such as flag burning that might arouse anger in other but it this case the outrage alone couldnot justify for supressing Johnson's freedom of speech.In this perspective,the Texas law discriminated upon view point in that though it punishes such actions,it still specifically exempt prosecution of actions with similar defination such as burning or burying of worn-out flag.
Therefore, flag burning in Texas v.Johnson constituted a symbolic speech and is protected by the Firts Amendment.
Answer:
EVERYDAY WORKERS!!
Explanation:
i fr got it wrong cuz all these foos saying entrepreneurs but it aint that!! Wait nevermind this is the answer For the Second half of his term :)
Alexander the Great didn't conquer Italy. Neither did he conquer China.
Alexander the Great was the leader of the hellenistic period in Greece and contributed to the creation of one of the greatest empires at the time which was spanning all around from the Greek peninsula all the way to Mesopotamia.
"<span>a. Many immigrants tried to maintain their traditional religion and diet" is the best option since many immigrants were Catholic, which upset the Protestant masses. </span>
