Answer:
The correct answer is under-employment.
Explanation:
Under-employment is when a resource is not fully utilized, such as when your Economics professor has to sweep the streets as a primary job.
Unemployment mean no job at all. It is situation in which workers are jobless, either because of no availability of jobs or because wokers are not accepting jobs at the going low wage rate. However, under-employment is a situation in which workers get part time jobs or jobs requiring lower education, training and skills than they have. It is quite common in under developed countries.
Answer:
The annual difference between Option 1 (15 years) and Option 2 (20 years) is $7,211.19 in favor of the first one.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Option 1:
Number of years= 15
FV= 450,000
i= 0.0525
Option 2:
Number of years= 20
FV= 450,000
i= 0.0525
To calculate the annual cash flow, we will use the following formula on each option:
A= (FV*i)/{[(1+i)^n]-1}
A= annual cash flow
<u>Option 1:</u>
A= (450,000*0.0525) / [(1.0525^15) - 1]
A= $20,464.72
<u>Option 2:</u>
A= (450,000*0.0525) / [(1.0525^20) - 1]
A= $13,253.53
The annual difference between Option 1 (15 years) and Option 2 (20 years) is $7,211.19 in favor of the first one.
Answer:
The court will rule in favor of Judy
Explanation:
Kristy made a valid offer to Judy and Judy accepted it before Dave accepted Kristy´s offer so Judy's acceptance should prevail.
In the offer letter, Kristy told Judy to "please respond to Bruce Townsend", but she did not specify that the only proper mode of acceptance was the response to Bruce. Since she did not specify that Judy could not respond directly to her, Judy's letter of acceptance to Kristy's offer is valid.
Kristy should have been more specific in stating that the only proper mode of acceptance was a response to Bruce.
Answer:
what is the question lol? I could probably help you out !
