Answer:
Georgeland has an absolute but not a comparative advantage in producing clothing.
Explanation:
Absolute advantage is defined as the ability of a firm to produce higher amounts of a product as a result of use of the same resources with other competitors. It is usually bad a result of more efficient production process.
Comparative advantage is the ability of a firm to produce goods at a lower opportunity cost. Therefore they are able to sell at lower price compared to competitors.
Georgeland can produce 18 units of clothe per year while Alland can produce 16 units per year, so Georgeland has absolute advantage.
In producing clothes Georgeland has opportunity cost of 36 units of food which is higher than that of Alland which is 32 units of food. So Georgeland does not have comparative advantage in producing clothes.
The answer is ATM fee in the amount of $2.75 or C.
HOPE THIS HELPS YOU
Answer:
Forgery refers to the crime pertaining to, alternation of legal obligation or rights in writing of another person. It is the production of the spurious work which is being considered to be genuine such as a painting, and coin. It is the action underlying imitation or forging a copy of the document, banknote, work of art and signature.
In the case, Debbie Brooks is solely responsible for the loss caused to her by the forged transaction. The fraud took place due to the recklessness of Debbie Brooks as she allowed Martha Tingstrom to handle her financial resources and accounts which in itself is a mistake. She failed to notice the transaction details promptly issued to her periodically by her bank and provided the details of such transaction to the bank within a period of 30 days. The bank is not liable as it has perform its obligation to the fullest. Therefore, it is ascertained that Debbie Brooks is solely responsible for the loss caused to her by the forged transaction made by Martha Tingstrom.
Explanation:
Answer:
I am from Long Island but live in NC
Explanation:
Answer:
$1905
Explanation:
Here we will have to calculate Economic Order Quantity to lower the ordering ordering and holding cost as much as we can. So here we will use the following formula to calculate the best number of units that we should order, which is as under:
Economic Order Quantity = SquareRoot (2 * Annual Demand * ordering cost per order / Holding cost per unit per year)
Here
Annual Demand = 900kg of palm oil per day * 52 weeks * 5 day a week / 7
Annual Demand = 900 * 52 * 5 / 7 = 33,429
And
Ordering cost per order = $57 per order
Annual holding cost per unit per year is 20% of $5.25 per kg which is $1.05.
So by putting values, we have:
Economic Order Quantity = Square Root (2 * 33,429 * 57 / 1.05)
Economic Order Quantity = 1905 kgs
