Answer:
Voltage-gated Ca2+ channels
Explanation:
Modulation of Ca+2 channel Epinephrine also causes an increase in cAMP that stimulates PKA that is protein kinase A, which in turn phosphorylates the voltage-gated Ca+2 channel that is the L channel. This phosphorylation results in a protein conformational change that enchances the channels activity.
Answer:
For 1. The virus starts in the lungs. From there, the virus invades the bloodstream and spreads to the skin, intestines, lungs, kidneys, and brain. The virus activity in the skin cells creates a rash that starts as macules (flat, red lesions).
The symptoms after actually catching the virus
Pain in the back or muscles
rashes, small bumps, blister, scab, or scar
You can have fever, malaise, or chills
headache or vomiting Is also pretty common. I hoped this helped bro
Explanation:
Initially, when scientists were first using the taxonomy system to classify living organisms there were only considered to be 2 kingdoms: plants and animals. However, when the microscope was invented, scientists were able to observe differences in organisms at the cellular level! They were also able to observe microscopic living organisms like bacteria that they had not been able to observe before. Scientists realized it was necessary to add 4 new kingdoms to account for the observations they had not seen before the invention of the microscope.
<span> For a start, when you have a question that needs answering in science, you formulate a null hypothesis. That is a negative statement which you then set out to prove or disprove. This is just a convention. So if your initial question is for example, "Does sugar dissolve in water?"
Your null hypothesis will be "Sugar does not dissolve in water."
You then set up your experiment and get some data.
Now if your data doesn't support your null hypothesis then you reject it and make the statement ,"Sugar does dissolve in water." As you can see from this simple example, a non-result is still a result so the idea of formulating new tests as mentioned by another answerer isn't necessary and in some ways is the incorrect thing to do. In science, hypotheses are often not supported by data and i would argue that this is the case a lot of the time. A non-result is still a result and you will have plenty to write about whichever way it goes. </span>
Answer:
it is w
Explanation:
i have done a similar question
