Answer:
c. She should tell him that he should have a policy provided to all employees offering to correct any offensive conduct, and that an unreasonable failure by an employee to take advantage of corrective opportunities offered through the policy would help him avoid liability.
Explanation:
This is most likely what Kiera should tell Richard. It is true that employers are generally liable for cases of discrimination and harassment at their own place of business. This is because such cases often indicate a lack of overview and proper management. However, one way to avoid such liability would be by having a policy offered to all employees offering to correct any offensive conduct.
Answer:
not sure exactly what you're asking but basically it's the right to remain silent because anything that is said can be used against you and you have the right to have an attorney
Explanation:
Answer:
A lobbyist is a professional whose job is to make contacts with influential people in Washington (or whatever government) and make a case on behalf of a client. They're regulated under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995. If you're spending most of your time chatting with Congressmen, then you need to file forms saying who you're talking to and on whose behalf. These forms are filed with the clerks in the House and the Senate.
While a Political Action Committee (PAC) is a group of people with some kind of interest. They collect money and spend it to promote that interest. They have to file forms, with the Federal Election Commission rather than with the legislative branch, though unlike the lobbyists they have ways to not disclose who's giving them money. They can hold public meetings, buy TV advertising, donate money to causes, give money to candidates (a small amount- about $5k to candidates and $15k to parties), and hire lobbyists.
Generally, when a PAC hires a lobbyist, the lobbyist is the one to go to the legislator and make the case on behalf of the PAC. They may also bring the PAC's own team to make the presentation, but they need to be very careful about crossing the (byzantine) set of rules trying to keep the ethical lines clear-ish. Conceivably, they could have lobbyists on staff, but it exposes the entire organization to levels of disclosure that they'd generally rather not have. Thus, the usual plan is for a PAC to hire an established lobbying firm, who is already registered and prepared to handle the paperwork.
Explanation:
Hope this helped :)
Explanation:
Procedural law consists of the set of rules that govern the proceedings of the court in criminal lawsuits as well as civil and administrative proceeds. Therefore, substantive law defines the rights and duties of the people, but procedural law lays down the rules with the help of which they are enforced
