Answer:
Justice Jackson's characterization of Marshall's Gibbon's opinion was correct because it helped lay down the foundation for railroads and pipelines, minimum wage regulation and prohibition of child labor. What did the Court say about enslaved African Americans' position in the United States in Dred Scott v.
Explanation:
<h2>
Answer:</h2>
<h3>What is the booking process in Florida?</h3>
Following an arrest, the defendant will be placed through the booking process. This is essentially the formal process by which a defendant is entered into the system. After the arrest, they will be taken to the police station; while there, all of their information will be formally gathered.
<h3>How does the booking process work?</h3>
Booking is the process of checking your identity, getting you into the jail system, and inputting the nature of the crime.Using a computer or ink-based fingerprinting system and running them through a crime database. Conducting a full-body search. Checking state and national records for warrants pending against you.
hope this help :)
Answer:
The main source of conflict was Parliament's insistence on closely regulating American commerce after the French and Indian War in 1763. While Parliament had always passed laws concerning the colonies, during the period of salutary neglect between 1660–1763, it failed to enforce those laws.
Answer:
b. disparate- impact discrimination
Explanation:
Disparate impact discrimination is a term used to refer to a situation where a member of a protected class felt harmed in a situation where he or she suffered unintentional discrimination. That is, this member suffered a type of discrimination that seemed harmless or neutral, but which harmed that member or harmed the group to which he belongs.
Answer:
Suzy is expected to be charged with attempted murder.
Explanation:
Suzy showed a strong intention to kill her husband, even though her plan failed and she was unable to actually kill her. For this reason, she should be charged with attempted murder and since there is direct evidence that she wanted to kill Bob, it is likely that she would be convicted, even without actually carrying out the crime.
This accusation would be prevalent, even if Suzi had not caused Bob any injuries or injuries.
