Answer:
Phineas
you user the app because I'm a tutor and it helps
True
Because they spend over 34 billion dollars I pretty sure I looked it up but don’t take me up on it
Answer: b. No, because the state acted as a market participant
Explanation:
The state in this instance was a market participant because they were acting as buyers who were looking for companies that could supply the service of exploiting their gas fields.
As a result, they have total discretion to pick whichever supplier they choose, regardless of the benefits or lack thereof, much like a normal buyer would do. The interstate company would therefore lose the case.
Answer:
It has the effect of providing presidential support and the support of their political party in the senate. Judges are appointed for life and a president hopes any judges that he as appointed will carry forward his legacy.
Explanation:
The answer is District of Columbia v. Heller
