Let's solve your equation step-by-step.<span><span><span>5x</span>+3</span>=<span><span>2x</span>−9</span></span>Step 1: Subtract 2x from both sides.<span><span><span><span>5x</span>+3</span>−<span>2x</span></span>=<span><span><span>2x</span>−9</span>−<span>2x</span></span></span><span><span><span>3x</span>+3</span>=<span>−9</span></span>Step 2: Subtract 3 from both sides.<span><span><span><span>3x</span>+3</span>−3</span>=<span><span>−9</span>−3</span></span><span><span>3x</span>=<span>−12</span></span>Step 3: Divide both sides by 3.<span><span><span>3x</span>3</span>=<span><span>−12</span>3</span></span><span>x=<span>−4</span></span>Answer:<span>x=<span>−<span>4</span></span></span>
None of these are correct
"<span>Many of the basic ideas that animated the </span>human rights movement<span> developed in the aftermath of the </span>Second World War<span> and the events of </span>The Holocaust, <span>culminating in the adoption of the </span>Universal Declaration of Human Rights<span> in Paris by the </span>United Nations General Assembly<span> in 1948. Ancient peoples did not have the same modern-day conception of universal human rights.</span><span> The true forerunner of human rights discourse was the concept of </span>natural rights<span> which appeared as part of the medieval </span>natural law<span> tradition that became prominent during the European </span>Enlightenment<span> with such philosophers as </span>John Locke<span>, </span>Francis Hutcheson<span>, and </span>Jean-Jacques Burlamaqui<span>, and which featured prominently in the political discourse of the </span>American Revolution<span> and the </span>French Revolution.<span> From this foundation, the modern human rights arguments emerged over the latter half of the twentieth century,</span><span> possibly as a reaction to slavery, torture, genocide, and war crimes,</span><span> as a realization of inherent human vulnerability and as being a precondition for the possibility of a </span>just society."
Answer:
- Explanatory
Explanation:
<u>Explanatory variable</u> is elucidated as the variable that could affect the response variable. This variable is quite identical with the independent variable as it can be controlled or changed that may affect the response variable(which is similar to dependent variable). However, the observational studies observe the natural responses without any manipulation and therefore, these variables cannot be changed always. In the given example, the 'number of hours spent on studying for the test' would be the explanatory variable as it directly influences the response variable i.e. 'grades.'
The FBI is only domestic so I think the answer is A. FBI
