The port on the Gulf of Mexico that was captured by union forces early in the war is : C. New orleans
The port was captured around 1 year after the civil war was started. Back then, new orleans was the largest confederate city which opened the chance for the union to gain many resources needed for the war
hope this helps<span />
India and Britain have a long and complicated history, starting in the 1600's.
By the late 1770's, the East India Company was starting to slowing gain political and territorial power for over 100 years. By the late 1800's, parliament places India under the direct control of Britain.
In 1869, the Suez Canal was opened. This made British goods and textiles easy to ship to India. British textiles were cheaper and made faster (machine-made) than India's own handmade textiles. This caused India's textile industry to collapse.
India was not happy under British rule. By the 1920's Mahatma Gandhi started campaigning for "noncooperation" and encourages people to avoid anything British. In the 1930's, he lead the Salt March, in an attempt to end Britain's monopoly on the salt market.
By 1947, India won its independence from Britain. The Muslim League wanted their own state. Britain divided India into two separate states: Muslim Pakistan and Hindu India.
Britain then left and withdrew from South Asia.
The thing which Charles Lindbergh was advocating in his speech is:
Based on the given speech, we can see that there is the argument made by the speaker in no uncertain terms about the <em>need for the United States</em> to remain neutral and not be drawn into a war which had nothing to do with them.
Furthermore, he believed that the British should not have declared war on Germany if they were <em>not capable of fighting</em> and winning the war without the inclusion of America.
He cited the rising unemployment, the economy, poverty rates which were all internal problems of America and they did not need to be persuaded or cajoled<em> to join the war of Britain.</em>
Read more about Charles Lindbergh here:
brainly.com/question/5853317
The decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that held that private citizens could not purchase lands from Native Americans. ... Thus, all that the opinion holds with respect to aboriginal title is that it is inalienable, a principle that remains well-established law in nearly all common law jurisdictions.
