Answer: The correct answer is YES it is admissible as evidence of the plumber's fault.
Explanation: An Evidence has probative value if it tends to prove an issue. The testimony of the homeowner of the regarding the plumber's response is a party admission. It is admissible as a hearsay exemption under Rule 801(d)(2)(A) which explains that a statement or statemens made by a party in a case cannot be excluded as hearsay when offered against him by the opponent. As such, the statement is a probative evidence.
Neudjsbqjaisinfhsu sorry need points
Answer:
c. The real interest rate is 1 percent and the expected inflation rate is minus 2 percent
Explanation:
Nominal interest rate = real interest rate + expected inflation rate.
For the third option, the nominal interest rate: 1% + (-2%) = -1%
For the first option, the nominal interest rate: 2% + 1% = 3%
For the second option, the nominal interest rate: 0 + 2% = 2%
For the fourth option, the nominal interest rate: -2% + 3% = 1%
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
Option (a) and (b) are considered or correct.
Explanation:
Under the following two conditions, a firm in a perfectly competitive market produces at a point where the marginal revenue is equal to the marginal cost:
(i) Minimum AVC < Price < minimum ATC : Yes
In this case, a firm may suffer a loss but it will be able to cover its minimum average variable cost. Hence, this firm continue operating in this market and if he shut down its operation then he may suffer a larger loss. Therefore, it chooses to continue operating under this market conditions.
(ii) Price > minimum ATC : Yes
In this case, the price received by the seller is greater than the minimum average total cost. Therefore, the firm is able to cover all of its cost of production and earning an economic profit. Hence, it obviously chooses to continue its operation.
The third option is not considered here because in this case, the firm won't be able to cover its variable cost.
