We can actually deduce here that the astronaut that raised his hand actually said that the colour of the feather placed on his helmet was blue and going further to give a logical explanation, he explained that this is because the sky of the planet where they are is blue.
<h3>What is logical explanation?</h3>
Logical explanation actually refers to the explanation that is given using logic and what everyone sees and knows. In logical reasoning, one speaks based on what he/she knows or acquires from reasoning or thinking through.
We see here that logically thinking, the helmet placed on their heads actually denoted sky and the blue feather denotes the colour of the sky. Remember they were told not to look up. That means what we are looking for is up which is the sky.
Thus, we can say here that the colour of the feather placed on his helmet is blue and it actually talks about the colour of their planet.
Learn more about logical reasoning on brainly.com/question/25175983
#SPJ1
An Oxymoron. For example saying, "One fine day, on the darkest night..."
The answer is:
Epstein, David. "Beat by an Underhand Girl." The Sports Gene. Penguin Group, 2013.
When writing references, the surname and name or initials of the author goes first. Next the title of the chapter within quotation marks, followed by the name of the book, publisher and year.
According to: The Argument's Best Friend
Ethos, logos, and pathos are persuasional tools that can help writers make their argument appeal<span> to readers; this is why they're known as the argumentative </span>appeals<span>. Using a combination of appeals is recommended in each essay. Make sure to consider carefully your audience and to stress the kind(s) of appeal that will be the most effective with each audience.
</span>
Hope this helps!!! & have a great day!!!!
The correct answer is D. Division
Explanation:
A fallacy refers to a faulty argument or argument that is invalid due to problems in the reasoning process, these issues are classified into different types of fallacies such as ad hominem faulty analogy, division, etc. In the case of division fallacy, this occurs when the speaker assumes something is true and valid about the parts that compose a unit just because this is true about the unit or the whole, which means the speaker believes. This occurs in the argument "That baseball team won the World Series, so the players must be outrageously talented baseball players", because the author of this argument assumes all the players are "outrageously talented" because the team or whole is talented, which is invalid as there might be players that are not that talented although the whole team was able to win.
