Answer:
The spending variance for "Employee salaries and wages" for March would have been closest to $1,200F
.
Explanation:
Customers served (q)
Employee salaries and wages ($58,400 + $1,000q)
The spending variance for "Employee salaries and wages" for March would have been closest to
Actual Results Flexible Budget Revenue and Spending Variances
(q) 26 26
($58,400 + $1,000q) $ 83,200 $ 84,400 $1,200F
When Megan purchased the Pepsi beverages and snacks to bring to her family's holiday celebration this represented the purchase of consumer goods. Consumer goods are anything from Pepsi products, to automobiles and refrigerators.
According to the case, the use of Ph.D. on the ads for hair care products by John Smith is considered an example of the fallacy of inappropriate expertise.
The provided statement is true.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
A fallacy is an unlawful statement that is used by someone in stating any reasoning or argument which can even be harmful to society.
In the given case, John is having Ph.D. degree in the archaeology field, and his attempt to use the word Ph.D. on the haircare goods marketed by him would be a fallacy in respect of inappropriate expertise. The fallacy could be the use of the Ph.D. word on ads and the inappropriate expertise is that he doesn't have any knowledge regarding skincare and dermatology area.
Therefore, this may create a harmful effect on the individuals who are buying them as it is not authorized by a dermatologist.
Learn more about the fallacy in the related link:
brainly.com/question/2516239
#SPJ1
Explanation:
1) Famous celebrities and the people with lots of money are often seen with workers round them for their household chores/tasks. Although they are paying money for the work they could have done by themselves but if we analyze closely, they are actually taking advantage of the opportunity cost. The time when they were suppose to do the household work, now they are performing other task in that time which will be giving them much greater economic benefit, taking advantage of the concept of opportunity cost. For example, Cristiano Ronaldo can focus on his workout and daily exercise instead of making daily meals for himself, so he should have hired someone to do the meal work for him while he perform his workout which will help him on the field and will earn him much money.
2) Yes, it is possible for 2 countries to benefit from trade as a whole because they can get into an agreement by allowing free trade between the countries, for example, both the countries could agree that all the trade which will be executed between them would be tax free and no duties will be paid on them. This way the trade numbers would increase and industrialization would take place to meet the export/import orders. On the contrary, trading individually can be not so beneficial because there will be no free trade agreements between individuals i.e. no free lunches, that is why it could cost individuals much more than they can make money out of it.
3) One of the main reasons to oppose policies that restrict trade among the nations is that GDP. GDP is a measure of growth in any country, therefore when there will be no trade among countries, it would result in less productions of goods and services which which lead to less industrialization, which then will result to low employment and more unemployment, ultimately resulting in very low growth for any country and since growth is the only way forward for any nation, economists oppose policies that restrict trade among countries/nations.
I hope this detailed answer of mine help the poster.
Thank You and Good Luck.
Answer:
c. reserves increase by $100 million and the money supply increases by more than $100 million
Explanation:
Based on the information given in a situation where a FRACTIONAL-RESERVE BANKING SYSTEM has no availability of EXCESS RESERVES and no CURRENCY HOLDINGS, which means that if the central bank buys BONDS that worth $100 million, the RESERVES will tend to INCREASE by the amount of $100 million while the MONEY SUPPLY on the other hand will INCREASES by more than $100 million.
