Answer:
Return on investment = 50%
Explanation:
Return on Investment is the proportion of investment cost that an investor earns as as return in dollar
For a mutual fund= total return in dollar/investment cost
= (48-32)× 500/(500× 32) × 100
=50%
<em>Note that the gains in dollar is the difference between the selling price at the end and the selling price at the beginnin</em>g.
Answer:
d) Purchasing $18,000 (000) worth of plant and equipment
D. As the cost are forecast they can change over the course of the expansion making possible to be above budget. This may lead to an emergency loan if the cash flow and inflow of the company are don't go as planned which could be the case during a project of this magnitude.
Explanation:
<em>Missing information:</em>
a) A $5 dividend
b) Liquidate the entire inventory
c) Retiring the oldest bond
d) Purchasing $18,000 (000) worth of plant and equipment
------------------
A) dividends would not be the cause as they are determinated by the company they can chose not to declare it.
B) lquidate the inventory means selling and not replenish. This generates cash it doesn't use cash
C) re-rolling the debt (by issuing new bonds) is a course of action planned and that in hte end will not affect the cash of the company as will be paying the bonds and receiving from the new bonds thus the changes in cash would be controlled.
D. As the cost are forecast they can change over the course of the expansion making possible to be above budget. This may lead to an emergency loan if the cash flow and inflow of the company are don't go as planned which could be the case during a project of this magnitude.
Explanation:
1) Famous celebrities and the people with lots of money are often seen with workers round them for their household chores/tasks. Although they are paying money for the work they could have done by themselves but if we analyze closely, they are actually taking advantage of the opportunity cost. The time when they were suppose to do the household work, now they are performing other task in that time which will be giving them much greater economic benefit, taking advantage of the concept of opportunity cost. For example, Cristiano Ronaldo can focus on his workout and daily exercise instead of making daily meals for himself, so he should have hired someone to do the meal work for him while he perform his workout which will help him on the field and will earn him much money.
2) Yes, it is possible for 2 countries to benefit from trade as a whole because they can get into an agreement by allowing free trade between the countries, for example, both the countries could agree that all the trade which will be executed between them would be tax free and no duties will be paid on them. This way the trade numbers would increase and industrialization would take place to meet the export/import orders. On the contrary, trading individually can be not so beneficial because there will be no free trade agreements between individuals i.e. no free lunches, that is why it could cost individuals much more than they can make money out of it.
3) One of the main reasons to oppose policies that restrict trade among the nations is that GDP. GDP is a measure of growth in any country, therefore when there will be no trade among countries, it would result in less productions of goods and services which which lead to less industrialization, which then will result to low employment and more unemployment, ultimately resulting in very low growth for any country and since growth is the only way forward for any nation, economists oppose policies that restrict trade among countries/nations.
I hope this detailed answer of mine help the poster.
Thank You and Good Luck.
Answer: False
Explanation:
A dissenting opinion refers to an opinion in a legal case that's written by the judge(s) who disagree with the court's majority opinion that gives rise to its judgment.
It should be noted that a justice who agrees with the outcome of a case but doesn't agree with the reason that was proffered by other justices can issue a concurring opinion and not a dissenting opinion.
Therefore, the correct option is False.