Answer:
Option A is correct.
Explanation:
A janitor that collects data through reviewing reports on a business counsel's desk could be a tippee for insider trading activities.
Probably, the justification for insider trading remains wrong being that it offers each insider the undue benefit on and around the marketplace, gets the insider's preferences beyond them for which they assume the trustee responsibility, as well as enables the insider to unfairly manipulate the cost of the inventory of a business.
So, the following are the reason the other options are not correct according to the given scenario.
Program p1;
var a,b,c,d : integer; {i presume you give integer numbers for the values of a, b, c }
x1, x2 : real;
begin
write('a='); readln(a);
write('b='); readln(b);
write('c=');readln(c);
d:=b*b - 4*a*c
if a=0 then x1=x2= - c/b
else
if d>0 then begin
x1:=(-b+sqrt(d)) / (2*a);
x2:=(-b - sqrt(d))/(2*a);
end;
else if d=0 then x1=x2= - b /(2*a)
else write ("no specific solution because d<0");
writeln('x1=', x1);
writeln('x2=',x2);
readln;
end.
The answer is Biases
The objectivity of evaluating a website relates to its ability to present issues based on different points of view. It is based on whether or not the information provided is presented in a fair and balanced way. For example, is the purpose of a certain website like Coca Cola or Pepsi meant to entertain, sell something, or sway public opinion? Do you think these websites will provide information on the negative effects of drinking carbonated beverages? I do not think so! Thus, these websites have bias. Their job is to sell you their product, not to make you think deep about it. We need to ask ourselves more questions about the websites we visit. Is this website balanced or biased in a way it presents information?
Show us a picture so we can answer
