Answer:
they were chosen by the legislature
they served a one year term
they could have decisions overruled by legislature
they had little power
Explanation:
The extended metaphor is the comparison of blake comparing the anger and the poison tree. He is saying that he kept in his anger and it grew into a poison <span>apple on the tree.
</span>
hope this helped
Brainliest answer plzz : )
<span>
</span>
The correct option is option 1. The 1851 Ohio Constitution increased the power of the General Assembly.
What was the need for the 1851 amendment in the Ohio constitution?
Many Ohioans thought the 1803 Constitution should be replaced by 1850. The first constitution's authors were not aware of new problems that had emerged. The Ohio General Assembly was endowed with considerable power by the Constitution of 1803. The legislature held the authority to choose judges and all other government officials, with the exception of the governor. As a result, the legislature had almost total power over the executive branch. The Supreme Court was mandated by the Constitution of 1803 to convene once a year in each county of the state. There were few counties when the Constitution of 1803 first came into operation. The following fifty years saw a growth in the number of counties, making it nearly difficult for the Supreme Court to do out its
Find more about the US constitution from the link below:-
brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ13
Answer:
- Good faith exception.
Explanation:
'Good Faith Exception' is demonstrated as the legal tenet which proffers the exemption or exception form the exclusionary rule as the IVth Amendment of U.S. Constitution states that 'if the evidence collected by the police through unlawful searches or seizures but done with a good faith belief, it could be admissible at the trial'.
As per the given description, <u>'good faith exception'</u> demonstrate the exemption to the exclusionary rule because the exclusionary rule usually states that evidence collected unlawfully or by violating the right to privacy would not be admissible during the trial but the 'good faith' exception states that 'if the law enforcement officers believe that their actions are in 'good-faith' it can be admissible by the court which marks the exception.
