Bandura's Bobo Doll experiment was the first step to developing the social learning theory. Children demonstrated observational learning. Furthermore, children demonstrated that violence is the most easily learned behavior.
The role of the proprietors was too watch over the colony send more people and resources but it seems the english government would always take the colonies and say you are unfit we now are the rulers of this colony.
Social information about what is true is to social information about what is appropriate, as informational influence is to normative influence.
Social information consists altogether the things that an individual can learn from others, be it through intentional communication, demonstrations, or the mere observations of behaviors that don't seem to be necessarily meant to be seen.
We use social information whenever we let it affect our behavior.
Social information theory is also known as an interpersonal communication theory and media studies theory.
Social information science is "an activity through which collective human actions represents knowledge."
It's the creation and processing of data by a bunch of people. As an instructional field Social information science studies the knowledge processing power of networked social systems.
To know more about social information here
brainly.com/question/20217929
#SPJ4
What argument would I present? I would present that everyone is equal and everyone has a voice if you had asked them to speak, people have different outlooks on being able to vote at 18 or 21. But I don't know much about voting, I don't, and don't plan on, voting ever. Soooooo.....
The U.S Supreme Court pronounced the balancing test in the Turner v. Safley case. The balancing test means that the courts must balance the rights of inmates against the penological concerns of security and order.
In this case, the U.S Supreme Court upheld broad restriction on inmate-to-inmate correspondence and, in the process, reaffirmed its commitment to a deferential standard in prisoner speech cases.
In Justice O’Connor’s opinion in Turner v. Safley, he identified four factors to consider when applying this standard:
- Whether or not there is a valid, rational link between the regulation and the governmental interest advanced to justify it;
- Whether inmates are left with alternative means of exercising the right that the regulation restricts;
- Whether accommodating the asserted right would have a significant ripple effect on fellow inmates or prison staff;
- And whether there is a ready alternative to the regulation that fully accommodates the asserted right at a minimal cost to valid penological interests.
To know more about penology here-
brainly.com/question/28043931
#SPJ4
