Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
Answer: The Missouri Compromise was a law passed in 1820 that regulated slavery in western territories and states. It abolished slavery above the 30/36 line of longitude. It contributed to the Civil War by making the North seem more aggressive in its anti-slavery views, causing Southern resentment.
Explanation:
Answer:
Christianity
Explanation:
It is the primary religion of America, Canada, and Mexico.
Answer:
Explanation:
Match what Bismarck hoped to accomplish by each of the following actions.
1. Russian friendship : To avoid a two-front war
2. English friendship : To isolate France
3. Triple Alliance
:To prevent a country from taking sides in a mainland European war .
Iron Chancellor Bismarck made the above political moves during his reign prior to World War 1 .
I think it’s B because divine rights was challenged
