A company will pay interest based on its credit rating and the length of time over repayment is scheduled to occur (1-year, 5- years, or 10 years).
<h3>How is interest decided?</h3>
- It is based on various risks such as credit risk and maturity risk.
- Credit risk of a company is shown in its credit rating.
- The maturity risk increases as the length of time to repayment increases.
The interest paid will therefore be dependent on the credit rating of the company and the term of the loan that it took out as these show different types of risk.
In conclusion, option A is correct.
Find out more on maturity risk at brainly.com/question/24780094.
The portfolio weights for a portfolio that has 185 shares of Stock A that sell for $64 per share is: 0.6775; 0.3325.
<h3>Portfolio weight for each stock</h3>
First step
Total value = 185($64) + 115($49)
Total value = $17,475
Second step
Portfolio weight for each stock is:
Portfolio weight A = 185($64)/$17,475
Portfolio weight A = .6775
Portfolio weight B = 115($49)/$17,475
Portfolio weight B = .3225
Therefore the portfolio weights for a portfolio that has 185 shares of Stock A that sell for $64 per share is: 0.6775; 0.3325.
The portfolio weights for a portfolio that has 185 shares of Stock A that sell for $64 per share is: 0.6775; 0.3325.
Learn more about Portfolio weight here:brainly.com/question/17279790
Answer:
Option B (Put seller) is the appropriate alternative.
Explanation:
- Put seller relates to the practice including its opportunity to then be implemented. That whenever a put application is approved, this same writer typically takes the equality of opportunity at either the strike amount from the lengthy put grabber.
- Writing possibilities seems to be an opportunity for investors. That being said, the earnings from composing the given opportunity would be constrained to either the premium, although the put buyer could keep going to create revenue or gains until another inventory would be zero.
Some other three situations do not relate to either the type of situation in question. So there is one that is the appropriate one.
Answer:
The correct answer is c. actual market outcomes provide a higher price than the efficient price of education.
Explanation:
In any country, there is a close positive correlation between a greater number of years of study and income, just as a higher degree of education is related to a lower incidence of poverty. In general, knowledge provides a great deal of benefits to its holders, so why might a government policy for investment in human capital be necessary? The answer could be that knowledge generates a series of “external benefits”, which are not always considered by people when making their decisions.
Economic activities generate costs and benefits, which can be private or external. In this way, whoever studies obtains a benefit for himself, for example a better salary, as explained above. That is the private benefit. But a series of external benefits are also generated, for example, the possibility of being better citizens, of improving the communication and performance of people in society, of generating new solutions to different human problems, among many others. Likewise, research and development activities lead to obtaining new knowledge. All these benefits are obtained thanks to preschool, primary, secondary, technical, university education, job training, among others.
The answer in the space provided is real options. Real
options are the choices in which are present or available in terms of
opportunities in the business investments. The reason that is termed as real is
because it is not considered to be financial instrument but rather as a
tangible asset.
