Answer:
Depends on the person but probably not
Explanation:
1) Town of Bayport:
We have that the residents value the fireworks at
a total of 50+100+300=450$. That is the utility they gain. But they
would also have to pay 360$ for the fireworks. The total outcome is
450$+(-360$)=90$. Hence, the outcome is positive and the fireworks pass
the cost benefit analysis.
If the fireworks' cost is to be split
equally, we have that each of the 3 residents has to pay 360/3=120$. Let
us now do the cost-benefit analysis for everyone.
Jacques stands to gain 50$ from the fireworks but would have to pay 120$. He will vote against it.
Also, Kyoko will gain 100$ but would have to pay 120$. He will lose utility/money from this so he will vote against.
Musashi on the other hand, would gain 300$ and only pay 120$. He is largely benefitted by this measure. Only he would
We have that 2 out of the 3 would vote against the fireworks, so that the fireworks will not be bought. The vote does not yield the same answer as the benefit-cost analysis.
2) Town of River Heights:
We have that the total value of the fireworks to the community
is 20+140+160=320$. The total value of the fireworks is lower than
their cost so their cost benefit analysis yields that they should not be
bought.
However, let's see what each resident says. The cost to each resident is 360/3=120$. Rina is against the fireworks since she will only gain 20$. Sean and Yvette are for the fireworks since they gain 140$ and 160$ respectively, which are larger than the cost of the fireworks to each of them (120$). Hence, 2 will vote for the fireworks and one will vote against and fireworks will be bought.
Again, the vote clashes with the cost-benefit analysis.
3) The first choice is wrong. It is very difficult for a government to provide the exact types of public goods that everyone wants because that would be too costly; one cannot have a public good that everyone pays for so that only a couple of people enjoy it. In our example, we saw that in every case, a public good and its production would have sime supporters and some adversaries.
Majority rule is not always the most efficient way to decide public goods; as we have seen in the second case, the cost-benefit analysis yields that the fireworks are not worth it but they are approved by the majority nonetheless.
The final sentence is correct. The differing preferences of the people make a clearcut choice impossible and the government has to take into account various tradeoffs and compromises in order to determine which public goods to provide.
<h2>
Behavioral view point is pertaining to the motivation and encouragement of employees towards achievements.</h2>
Explanation:
Initially the organization was
- concentrating only on the productivity of the employee
- lost focus on motivating employees
- not providing much "employee-friendly" atmosphere
Later on, the "Behavioral management" theory helped the organization
- a shift from Production to leadership based work culture
- a good work environment to satisfy the employees
- Motivate to achieve good results
- Reach both individual and organization's goal
- Motivating by providing Increase in the wages
Answer:
1. GAAP is the term used to indicate the whole body of FASB authoritative literature. <u>TRUE</u>.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board are the authors of the GAAP and as such GAAP is used to indicate the whole body of their literature.
2. Any company claiming compliance with GAAP must comply with most standards and interpretations but does not have to follow the disclosure requirements. <u>FALSE. </u>
To claim compliance with GAAP, all standards and interpretations including Disclosure requirements should be followed.
3. The primary governmental body that has influence over the FASB is the SEC. <u>TRUE.</u>
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is the Government body that is meant to oversee the application of Accounting standards and as such, they have influence over the FASB.
4. The FASB has a government mandate and therefore does not have to follow due process in issuing a standard.<u> FALSE. </u>
Even though they have a Government mandate, the FASB must follow due process when establishing principles so that people might be able to contribute to or criticize the guidelines should they please.
Answer:
$65,000
Explanation:
The total cost of the additional order will be $46,000 of fixed costs and an additional $160 of variable costs for each of the 370 bikes. The additional production cost is:
If each bike is going to be sold for $460, then the additional income (excluding taxes) from accepting this order is:
Radar's additional income is $65,000.
