Answer:
1. 4,200 units
2.7,200 units
Explanation:
<u>Prepare the Production Budget for January and February</u>
January February
Budgeted Sales 5,000 4,000
<em>Add </em>Budgeted Closing Stock 3,200 6,400
Total Production Needed 8,200 10,400
<em>Less</em> Budgeted Opening Stock (4,000) (3,200)
Budgeted Production 4,200 7,200
Budgeted Opening Stock for January comes from 80% of closing inventory from December !
Answer:
D) No Yes Yes
Explanation:
As we know that
The conversion cost includes the direct labor cost and the manufacturing overhead cost
And, the manufacturing cost records the
= Cost of direct material cost + Direct labor cost + Manufacturing Overhead cost
And, the prime cost includes the direct material cost and the direct labor cost that is directly related to the production process of the product.
Answer:
$38,750 Favorable
Explanation:
Fixed overhead absorption rate:
= Fixed Overhead Costs for March (static budget) ÷ Production(static budget)
= $387,500 ÷ 31,000
= 12.5 per unit
Fixed overhead production−volume variance:
= Amount actually applied - Amount budgeted
= (12.5 × 34,100) - $387,500
= $426,250 - $387,500
= $38,750 Favorable
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
When supply is perfectly inelastic, the supply curve is vertical as shown in the attached plot. Thus, the tax that shifts the supply curve upward would have no effect on the equilibrium quantity or price paid by consumers. Since equilibrium quantity or price paid by consumer don't change there's no burden on them. However, no team's owners would receive a lower after tax price and thus bearing the entire tax burden.
The answer is C hope it helps