He had Severe Weather on his journey
According to Kohlberg, morality based simply on your own self-interest represents preconventional morality.Kohlberg's<span> Theory of </span>Moral<span> Development includes 6 stages of </span>moral development, separated into 3 levels: <span>Pre-conventional, Conventional and <span>Post-conventional</span></span><span>. In the stage of preconventional morality our moral code is shaped by the standards of adults and the consequences of following or breaking their rules.</span>
Answer:
D. John honked his horn several times, turned into the oncoming lane, and sped around a stalled car.
Explanation:
An observation is something you sense: taste, touch, smell, see, or hear.
You can hear and see (observe) the way in which John is driving.
Answer:
evolutionary
Explanation:
Evolutionary perspective: The evolutionary perspective has been studied by Alfred Russel Wallace and Charles Darwin during 1858 who published the theory of evolution.
The evolution theory is based on natural selection that is described as a phenomenon whereby organisms changes with time as a consequence of inheritable behavioral or physical traits' changes. It states that an organism's personality and the individual difference is being evolved that leads to adaptive changes for reproduction and survival.
In the question above, the given statement represents the evolutionary conception or perspective.
Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
