Answer:
<em>Quasi Contract</em>
Explanation:
A quasi contract <em>is a two-party retroactive agreement that has no prior commitments to each other.</em> A judge creates it to correct a situation where one party at the expense of the other obtains something.
The agreement is intended to prevent one party from taking undue advantage of the situation at the expense of the other party.
The diminishing returns to specialization suggests that it is worthwhile for companies to specialize until that point where the resulting gains from trade are outweighed by diminishing returns.
<h3>What is the
diminishing returns to specialization?</h3>
This diminishing return happens when the resources can move freely from the production of one good to another within a country.
However, its suggests that it is worthwhile for companies to specialize until that point where the resulting gains from trade are outweighed by diminishing returns.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about diminishing returns
<em>brainly.com/question/19070161</em>
#SPJ1
<span>100%-35%=65%
the compliment of 35% is 65%
</span>
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
A pesar de que no se anexan opciones o incisos para responder, podemos decir lo siguiente.
Aquí estamos hablando de los costos históricos. Estos costos son los que se produjeron en determinado periodo: los costos de los productos vendidos o los costos de los que se encuentran en proceso.
Un buen contador dentro de la empresa, se basará en estos costos históricos para poder predecir o proyectar los costos predeterminados y tener cierta información de lo que puede suceder a corto o mediano plazo.
Recordemos que esos costos predeterminados son necesarios para que los contadores puedan elaborar presupuestos lo más apegados a la realidad y se puedan ajustar con el tiempo. Para elaborar estos costos predeterminados, el contador hace uso de herramientas estadísticas.
Answer:
A. $270,000 gain
B. $240,000 gain
Explanation:
A. Calculation to determine the tax consequences to Oriole Corporation on the distribution of the land
Tax consequences=$520,000 – $250,000
Tax consequences=$270,000 gain
Therefore Oriole will recognize a $270,000 gain on the distribution
B. Calculation to determine the tax consequences to Oriole on the distribution
Tax consequences=$490,000 – $250,000
Tax consequences= $240,000 gain
Therefore Oriole will recognize a gain of $240,000 on the distribution.