Answer:
A
Explanation:
During the 1700s and 1800s, colonists took part in the American Slave Trade, where they drove thousands of Africans out of their home countries and forced them to work for the Americans. Due to the color of the Africans' skin, colonists thought that they were inferior to Americans/whites and that colonists could then work Africans without any pay.
This kind of work not only gave colonists a sense of freedom because they no longer had to endure the backbreaking work, but it also relieved them of financial burden since they didn't have to pay their slaves.
Look for an answer choice that matches the above description. Only A makes sense.
B is wrong because people were not required to have slaves. They could if they wanted to.
C is wrong because it was not illegal to pay slaves; colonists just chose not to because that would benefit them more.
D is wrong because it was not illegal for others to do work; in fact, many colonists did work on their own farms before, during, and after the Slave Trade.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Nirvana
Explanation:
A state of perfect peace and release from the cycle of birth, death, and rebirth; state once enlightenment has been attained.
The correct answer is "Criterion validity."
The option that determines this relationship is <em>criterion validity.</em>
When using criterion validity, Patagonia tries to assess a potential employee’s capability within the standards of the organization. The managers of the company want to determine how well they predict a potential employee’s actual job performance based on scores on the employee’s selection procedure.
This statistical method -criteria validity- tries to identify how well a measure validates or predicts an outcome of another measure. In a company, the Human Resources Department applies this test to a candidate as part of the interview mechanism to confirm that he/she would be the right candidate for the job.
The answer is standard of living. Standard of living refers to the quality and quantity of products and goods available to a population at a given time. It is also defined as the level of wealth, comfort, material goods and necessities available in a certain geographic area or place.
Marks explains that we have been made to believe that conflict is bad and compromise is good. He describes this as a vision that is too simplistic to be upheld by the nations of the world. Marks says it will be difficult to determine whether conflict is good or bad if we do not understand the people involved in the conflict, the cause and the strategy involved in the conflict.
He said compromise, contrary to general belief, can be harmful if it does not protect the vulnerable and the dis-empowered.
Marks gave an example of a United Nations agency that collaborated with the federal and local governments, television company, and even a multinational soda company in order to address the problem of poor sanitation in schools in India. This arrangement helped the corporation to promote their brands and products. Marks argued that, the United Nations were creating another problem while trying to solve one by promoting a soda company, knowing fully well that a large consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages increases the risk of obesity.
The mistake governments make, according to Marks, when they collaborate with industries is that they conflate the common good with common ground. They sacrifice the interest of the people on the alter of industrial collaboration.
By saying that governments should struggle or engage in conflicts with corporations, Marks means that the corporations always act to promote their commercial interests while government is saddled with the responsibility of promoting the common good, they should not leave this responsibility while trying to go into relationship with the corporations.
I have had cause to go into conflict with a police officer in my state because he demanded a bribe from me despite having all my driving particulars. I shouted at him and promise to report him to the authority if he did not desist from that practice. he became scared and allowed me to go.
