"<u>Other countries follow suit and shift funds from conservation to food</u> " is the one among the following that would be a potential negative externality for the global environment.
INTERPRETATION-
In an effort to boost agri-business and enhance food security in Africa, the African Development Bank Board has approved a US$15 million equity investment in Africa Food Security Fund (AFSF), to support enterprises in agri-business SMEs and enhance food security in Africa
AFSF is a second-generation fund targeting a total capitalization of US$ 100 million. The Fund will invest in potential high-growth Small and Medium Enterprises operating in the food and agriculture value chains across sub-Saharan Africa. It aims to address the needs of least served operators in agricultural SMEs segment that are not targets of the larger private equity funds and commercial banks.
Therefore, we can conclude that the correct option is D.
Your question is incomplete, but most probably your full question was:
The federal government approves additional funding for food resources in Africa. Which of the following would be a potential negative externality for the global environment?
A. Demands on food resources in Africa increase.
B. Incidents of starvation-related illnesses decrease.
C. Local economies benefit from increasing number of aid workers.
D. Other countries follow suit and shift funds from conservation to food.
Learn more about Federal Government for Food on:
brainly.com/question/10426252
#SPJ4
