Answer:
Claim
Explanation:
It is an opinion that cannot be definitively proven.
Answer:
The answer to Part A would be Ignorant, as the author goes on to state that his youthful understanding had struggled in vain. If someone is ignorant of something, yet they do not take the time to actually go research or learn about that thing, then they would be struggling in vain because they are selfish and not taking time to research what it is that the other person is saying that they do not understand.
For the answer to Part B, I would say that (Frederick) Douglass' new awareness of how owners maintain control over slaves allows him to better understand how to improve his situation. I say this because he seems to have an awakening/epiphany in the very last line: "I now understood what had been to me a most perplexing difficulty".
Explanation:
I hope this helps!
Answer:
the option supporting the given inferences from <em>A Doll's house </em>are -
option A, option C and Option E.
Explanation:
Option A, "the same little feather head", says, Nora is a little feather head, connoting the <em>childishness of Nora</em>.
Option C, "That is like a woman", says that Nora is like <em>womanly kiddish</em>, as the male chauvinism of the society suggests.
Option E, “What is this! Is my little squirrel out of temper?”, says that Nora is presented again a little and that to squirrel who are among the <em>small creature with loose temper.</em>
Answer:
Is this a academic question? Or a personal question if academic please do not put imagine that fools people
Explanation:
