Answer:
option (D) $50 billion.
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Additional investment spending = $20 billion
MPC = 0.6
Now,
Increase in aggregate demand = [1 ÷ (1 - mpc) ] × Investment
or
Increase in aggregate demand = [1 ÷ (1 - 0.4) ] × $20 billion
or
Increase in aggregate demand = (1 ÷ 0.4) × $20 billion
or
Increase in aggregate demand = 2.5 × $20 billion
or
Increase in aggregate demand = $50 billion
Hence.
the correct answer is option (D) $50 billion.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. Stand-alone branding.
Explanation:
In the model of independent brands (house of brands) different brands coexist independently acting on the basis of the different lines of business. This model allows attacking different market segments with specialist brands in each of them, but in the face of the great freedom it provides, minimal synergies between brands are used. For example, LVMH, the world leader in luxury products, has in its portfolio brands such as MOËT & CHANDON, DIOR, AG HEUER or SEPHORA, among others, which operate without any link to the corporate brand.
Answer:
the numbers are missing, so I looked for a similar question:
- investment today = $3,000
- receive $10,250 in 5 years
a) I will use the future value formula to determine the internal rate of return:
future value = present value x (1 + r)ⁿ
- future value = 10,250
- present value = 3,000
- n = 5
10,250 = 3,000 x (1 + r)⁵
(1 + r)⁵ = 10,250 / 3,000 = 3.4166667
⁵√(1 + r)⁵ = ⁵√3.4166667
1 + r = 1.27855826
r = 0.27855826 = 27.86%
b) assuming a $3,000, 27.86%, 5 year annuity, the annual payment will be:
annual payment = principal / FV annuity factor, 27.86%, 5 periods
- principal = $10,250
- PV annuity factor, 27.86%, 5 periods = 8.67633
annual payment = $10,250 / 8.67633 = $1,181.38
