1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alex41 [277]
2 years ago
10

Which of the following is an exception to the claim that Americans don’t vote and don’t participate when compared to other advan

ced democracies?
In some countries like Belgium and Australia voting is mandatory.
Americans participate to a larger degree in church organizations, volunteering for civil society and helping people in need than most Europeans.
All of the above are examples that undermine the contention that Americans participate less.
History
1 answer:
Drupady [299]2 years ago
7 0

Which of the following is an exception to the claim that Americans don’t vote and don’t participate when compared to other advanced democracies?

A. In some countries like Belgium and Australia voting is mandatory.

This shows the supporting detail that is used to show that Americans don’t vote and don’t participate when compared to other advanced democracies as their voting is not mandatory.

<h3>What is Voting?</h3>

This refers to the civic duty and responsibility of any citizen of a country and this is where they cast their vote for their preferred candidates in an election.

Hence, we can see that the exception to the claim that Americans don’t vote and don’t participate when compared to other advanced democracies is A. In some countries like Belgium and Australia voting is mandatory.

Based on the fact that voting is not mandatory in America, but it is in Belgium and Australia, this lends credence to the claim that Americans don’t vote and don’t participate when compared to other advanced democracies.

Read more about voting here:

brainly.com/question/13474496
#SPJ1

You might be interested in
What was King trying to convince his audience to do/think with this appeal?
miv72 [106K]

Answer:

King used an appeal to pathos, in order to persuade his viewers to aid in the quest for equality. By using the power of human emotion, King established the connection needed to oppression blacks faced.

8 0
3 years ago
In many Muslim cultures men and women follow rules about
Gemiola [76]
Religon i think i am young so idk 
4 0
3 years ago
What is rip van winkles's relationship with nature?
Tresset [83]
For Rip Van Winkle, nature offers Rip a sense of freedom.  Early in the story, he desires to leave his nagging wife and all the difficulties of modern, industrialized life behind.  By escaping into the woods and living in nature, he feels he will be able to leave freely in solitude and peace. Nature, then, serves as a place where Rip can find harmony and personal satisfaction.  
7 0
3 years ago
The presidential election fund was created in 1971 to provide
slega [8]

The presidential election fund was created in 1971 to provide <u>fund for presidential primary campaigns and national party conventions</u>.

<u>Explanation</u>:

Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 was passed by the federal government of United States of America. This act was created to fund the presidential primary campaigns and national party conventions.

The government thought that this funding scheme can reduce the dependency of the government representatives on the donation from the private sectors. By doing this, the influence of large corporation and private sectors in the election can be reduced.

6 0
3 years ago
How do you think Native Americans would have responded to news about the Treaty of Tordesillas and the Line of Demarcation
grandymaker [24]

For Native Americans at the time, it would have been next to impossible to understand something like the Treaty of Tordesillas. This treaty intended to partition tracts of land that the Europeans did not even know whether they existed, an action that may have looked like sheer madness and even dishonorable, for the Europeans claimed possession of lands they had not conquered by the force of their arms.Maybe, after some thought and analysis,  Native Americans would have felt outraged as a man living in such a distant place, the Pope in Rome, who had no authority whatsoever for them, made the decision of handing over lands, people,wealth, etc, to two different groups of Europeans. Perhaps, other Native Americans, once they managed to understand that agreement so odd to them, might have found it laughable and it might have prompted them to challenge to take what was their own over their dead bodies.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What type of crop is mostly to grow across russia
    12·1 answer
  • What are factors of production?
    13·2 answers
  • What is a difference between oil and flour?
    13·1 answer
  • What punishment would a corporate violator of the sherman antitrust act face
    13·2 answers
  • Can someone help me with this
    11·1 answer
  • The US Constitution set up three branches of government so that each branch could limit the power of the others. Categorize each
    6·1 answer
  • The main reason the London Company sponsored Jamestown was to form a colony allowing religious freedom.
    12·1 answer
  • What gives you the most points in the DBQ according to the rubric?<br> (AP world history)
    7·1 answer
  • The importance of the eastern roman empire on medieval history, especially in eastern europe
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following choices correctly matches the Constitutional amendment to its explanation?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!