Answer:
Yes, some of the flaws in the social system according to her reviewed experiment are:
i. High cost of house rent.
ii. Inaccurate mode of determining the poverty level.
iii. Prejudice between the rich and poor.
iv. Unreliable job advertisements.
Explanation:
Barbara Ehrenreich conducted a live experiment in which she worked at minimum-wage jobs so as to know the reality of the situation with a minimum-wage worker.
Some flaws in the social system she pin-pointed are:
i. Sporadic increase in housing costs, especially in high-wage areas of the country.
ii. The official poverty level is still calculated by the archaic method of taking the cost of food for a family of a given size and multiplying this number by three. This method used to determine the level of poverty is not applicable anymore in the present society.
iii. When the rich and the poor compete for housing on the open market, the poor don’t stand a chance.
iv. Job advertisements are not reliable determinant of the actual jobs available at any particular time.
She gave a general solution by imploring the government to step in and help.
The correct answer is B) Cincinnatus accepted the role of dictator in a crisis and then gave up its power; Caesar used a crisis to gain power and then made himself dictator for life.
<em>The statement that best describes Cincinnatus and Julius Caesar is “Cincinnatus accepted the role of dictator in a crisis and then gave up its power; Caesar used a crisis to gain power and then made himself dictator for life.”
</em>
Cincinnatus was a Roman statesman that is recognized for his talent and did not ambitioned power for the sake of power. He became a dictator when Rome was in crises. He accepted the call and did his best to solve the situation. As soon as he finished with his government responsibilities, he retired. On the other hand, Julius Caesar was the opposite. Julius Caesar used a crisis in Rome in order to gain power and control the empire. After that, he proclaimed himself dictator. That is why his personal group of people planned the conspiracy to assassinate him.
Answer:
In court the judge was not impartial.
Explanation:
A judge is supposed to be impartial