Opponents of prohibition argued that doing this governmental regulations was contrary to basic constitutional values and consume

Question

jeyben [28]

2 years ago

10

Opponents of prohibition argued that doing this governmental regulations was contrary to basic constitutional values and consume

r freedoms?

Business

1 answer:

Lera25 [3.4K] · Answer 1 · 2023-06-05T06:16:54+03:00

The opponents of prohibition argued that doing the Moralizing governmental regulations was contrary to basic constitutional values and consumer freedoms.

<h3>What is the Moralizing regulation?</h3>

Basically, the term "Moralizing" means the action of commenting on issues of right and wrong, such as with an unfounded air of superiority or having an overly critical point of view on issues of right and wrong.

From the moral values, the government regulation can emphasizes respect for rules and ethical considerations as the rules are the supreme guarantor of morality, ethics, and justice.

However, the opponents of prohibition argued that doing the Moralizing governmental regulations was contrary to basic constitutional values and consumer freedoms.

Because the government rules are the supreme guarantor of morality, ethics, and justice, then, the government should grant scheduled importance to the law along the way of earning decisions.