1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
STALIN [3.7K]
2 years ago
13

Honor Biology:

Biology
1 answer:
Levart [38]2 years ago
3 0

Remnant magnetism data -1950-, bathymetric and magnetic studies-early 1960s-, and evidence of continental edges fitting together -1964- were necessary to finally accept the theory of continental drift.

<h3>What is the paleomagnetic evidence that supports the theory of continental drift?</h3>

Although Wegener proposed a series of pieces of evidence to prove the idea of continental drift, the theory's acceptance needed more evidence to be approved.

In the <u>1950</u>s, Runcorn, Irvin, and other geologists, when looking at the remnant magnetism of Phanerozoic, found that rocks from the same area showed different orientations, and the pattern repeated in rocks of different ages.

Note: Let us remember that the term remnant magnetism refers to how magma solidifies and crystallizes into igneous rock following the magnetic field orientation.

So these researchers found that rocks in the same area exhibited different apparent magnetic pole positions. Initially, they thought this could be due to a change in the position of the magnetic pole over time.

However, after several studies including all continents, researchers discovered that the difference in crystallization orientation was due to a change in continental position rather than in the magnetic pole position.

When reconstructing Pangea, paleomagnetic curves drown from rock orientation, overlapped suggesting the crystallization occurred following the same magnetic pole during the unique continent period.

More evidence was discovered between the late 1950s and early 1960s. Heezen, Dietz, Hess, and other researchers collected bathymetry data of the ocean floors and the magnetic properties of the oceanic crust, providing more information about the seafloor spreading and the consequent continental separation.

In 1964 Bullard also could demonstrate that continental coastal shapes were not an effect of erosion but feet because they used to be united during the Pangea period. He showed that continental edges fit together even at 3,300-foot depth.

Remnant magnetism data -1950-, bathrymetric and magnetic studies-early 1960s-, and evidence of continental edges fitting together -1964- were useful to accept the theory of continental drift.

You can learn more about evidence of the theory of continental drift at

brainly.com/question/28168801

brainly.com/question/1544819

brainly.com/question/14606229

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
The fact that an organism's offspring are not identical is known as
joja [24]

Answer:

B. Inherited Variation

Explanation:

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain the importance of scientific names.
prohojiy [21]

Answer:

Every recognized species on earth (at least in theory) is given a two-part scientific name. This system is called "binomial nomenclature." These names are important because they allow people throughout the world to communicate unambiguously about animal species.

3 0
3 years ago
In humans, an MN blood group system is under control of an autosomal locus found on chromosome 4, with two alleles designated L^
ikadub [295]

Answer:

REWRWEQ24

Explanation:

AWEWSAWAWDASEWEWSDСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУКСУК

7 0
4 years ago
The pea aphid, a type of insect, contains light-capturing pigments in its exoskeleton. Scientists hypothesize that pea aphids ga
kondor19780726 [428]

Answer:Based on the information given we can not say pea aphid as an autotroph. Because pea aphid ability to produce ATP in the presence of sun is due to the light-capturing pigment that it gains from the genes transferred from fungi.

As pea aphid do not have any chloroplast and it cannot fix carbon so it is not a true autotroph. We can say it false autotroph because it can produce ATP in the presence of sunlight and can show increased production of ATP at the higher level of pigment.

Explanation: Sub to rockingmycoolstyle15 on yt

6 0
3 years ago
Please help me with this question
Inga [223]
D a change in color of a subtance
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which process added new genes to a gene pool?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of these best describes Earth's crust?
    12·2 answers
  • Arianne recently traveled abroad where she enjoyed eating food from different countries and learning about different cultures. A
    7·2 answers
  • 01.03]Which of the following statements about science is true? Science is built on opinions and assumptions. Science is tested b
    14·2 answers
  • Achondroplasia (dwarfism) is an autosomal dominant trait. A man and a woman of normal height have a son with achondroplasia. The
    9·1 answer
  • Identify the body systems that protect from pathogens?
    10·1 answer
  • DNA is to T as RNA is to ?
    8·1 answer
  • How are blood cells and stomach cells similar? (1 point)
    14·1 answer
  • Ethical dilemmas raised by dna technology and knowledge of the human genome include?
    8·1 answer
  • The hypothalamus communicates with the via the hypothalamic-hypophyseal portal system. quizlet
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!