Answer:
cooperation and competition are based on personality characteristics that are consistent across social situations.
Explanation:
According to the experiment done by Samuels, Liberman, and Ross (2004); in which they assigned the participants who have already been identified as cooperative and competitive performed accordingly. The participants, who have been considered as competitive performed more competitively as compared to participants being considered as cooperative, because an individual's personality characteristics remain same or consistent through various social situations.
Answer:
1. Invalid and weak
2. Invalid and strong.
Explanation:
The first argument does not present statements that support and justify it and for that reason, we can consider it a weak argument. In addition, the conclusion of the argument is not consistent with its premise, presenting a fallacy and causing wrong reasoning, which shows that the argument is invalid.
Similarly, the second argument has a conclusion that contradicts the information shown above, which invalidates the argument. However, the argument presents additional information that can support and justify it, for this reason, we can consider it a strong argument.
Answer:
the arts and other manifestations of human intellectual achievement regarded collectively.
Answer:
10 pounds
Explanation:
You do $12 divided by 3 you get 4. Then you get 1 pound = $4. Then you do $40 divided by $4. That equals 10 pounds.