Answer:
Informational social influence is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Many people talk about academic excellence — but who or what really defines this elusive quality?
Michèle Lamont, Robert I. Goldman Professor of European Studies and professor of sociology and of African and African American studies, analyzes the system of peer review in her new book “How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment” (Harvard University Press, 2009). By examining the process of scholarly evaluation, she also addresses larger questions about academia.
“In some ways studying peer evaluation and review is a point of entry into a much broader issue, which is the issue of meritocracy in American higher education,” says Lamont.
To research the book, Lamont interviewed panelists from research councils and societies of fellows who were evaluating proposals for research funding in the social sciences and the humanities.
Lamont explains that academics must constantly make evaluations, whether of scientific findings or of graduate students. Expertise, personal taste, and the perspective of the evaluator play into the decision-making process, she writes.
“A lot of what the book does is to look at what criteria people use to judge and what meaning they give to these criteria,” says Lamont. “So for instance, what do they mean by ‘significance’ and what do they mean by ‘originality’? How does the definition of ‘originality’ and ‘significance’ vary between philosophy and economics? How strong is the consensus between fields?
Answer:
The answer is D.
Explanation:
If they start getting limits on a product, they will start charging more for that price so that they can pay for more supply. I hope this helps. Let me know if it doesn't. :)
Answer:
Thus, Ibn Battuta's urge to travel was spurred by interest in finding the best teachers and the best libraries, which were then in Alexandria, Cairo, and Damascus. He also wanted to make the pilgrimage to Mecca, called the “hajj,” as soon as possible, out of eagerness and devotion to his faith.
hope I helped
Explanation:
Answer:b) Artists are critical thinkers, meaning they question assumptions and explore new directions.
Explanation:
So What Exactly Is Critical Thinking?
Critical thinking refers to being able to think broadly and independently and be able to digest the information that you receive and make a logical conclusion.
Critical thinkers are always questioning everything or new ideas before they can welcome them or use them they want to think in a broader sense than just thinking about now and here hence they take extra steps to acquire extra information on the issue.
Critical Thinking Versus Being Critical
Critical thinking doesn't refer to being judgemental of others eventhough it can look for mistakes in particular reasoning or ideas but the aim is to find reasonable explanation of things rather than to criticize the idea.
How Art Improves Critical Thinking
Critical thinking comprises rational and logical cognitive levels because it requires someone to think out of their ordinary comfort zone , to branch out and find new ways of doing things it allows artist to explore new ideas of creativity and challenge the existing norms.
Art allows students to have a broader view of the world and try to break down all those layers and bridges that may hinder them to reach their full creativity and enhancing their critical thinking.
