According to the courts decision why may illegally seized evidence not be used in a trial

History

2 answers:

scZoUnD [109]3 years ago

4 0

They might not have an warrant so it was illegally taken

IgorC [24]3 years ago

3 0

Hello!

The courts' decision that illegally seized evidence cannot be used in a trial is known as the exclusionary rule. This was decided for two main reasons:
One was to control police behavior and ensure that they only collect legal evidence with a warrant and probable cause. The second reason is that illegally obtained evidence violates a person's constitutional rights (people cannot be forced to subject themselves to searches and seizures without a legal search warrant - 4th Amendment).

I hope this helps you! Have a great day!<span />

You might be interested in

giving brainleist, 10 points. hurry

nignag [31]

It’s actually 5 points not 10

6 0

3 years ago

I need help asap!!!!!!!

Lunna [17]

Answer:

im sorry i cant see the question all i can see it a blocked icture let me show you

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

The Bill of Rights includes

tatiyna

The answer is B. The first 10 amendments of the Constitution

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Once a body is in top physical condition, the 24 hour recovery period after low-intensity exercise can be saftey skipped

sashaice [31]

This is a true statement
-the answer is True

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

This group believed in following the Constitution strictly and saving implied

Maslowich

Answer:

Option C, Republicans, is the right answer.

Explanation:

The Republican leaders or politicians opposed the Federalist views about government. While the Federalists favored a strong national government, the Republicans favoured a weak national government. Moreover, they were the ones who believed in the strict interpretation of the Constitution and thus rejected the idea of implied powers and argued that the implied powers should be saved for emergencies.

5 0

3 years ago