The process that would not normally be disrupted by acute labyrinthitis. a) Ossicle movement.
Labyrinthitis is the irritation of part of the inner ear referred to as the labyrinth. The eighth cranial nerve (vestibulocochlear nerve) may also be infected. The inflammation of those reasons is a feeling of spinning (vertigo), listening to loss, and other symptoms.
It takes time for labyrinthitis signs and symptoms to move away absolutely. Severe signs and symptoms commonly depart within a week. most of the people are absolutely higher within 2 to 3 months. Older adults are more likely to have dizziness that lasts longer.
The signs of labyrinthitis and vestibular neuritis can also come on unexpectedly. Signs and symptoms of the 2 conditions may be very similar. you may: have vertigo – this is the sensation that you, or things around you, are spinning even when you're still. It takes time for labyrinthitis symptoms to move away completely. Excessive symptoms typically go away inside every week. most people are absolutely higher within 2 to a few months. Older adults are much more likely to have dizziness that lasts longer.
The question is incomplete. Please read below to find the missing content.
What process would NOT normally be disrupted by acute labyrinthitis?
a) Ossicle movement
b) Head movement detection
c) Balance
d) Hearing
Learn more about labyrinthitis here brainly.com/question/802655
#SPJ1
Answer:
British and France take over Egypt and controlled Egyptian railways, ports, finances, etc.
Explanation:
The Suez Canal played a crucial role in conducting international trade and colonizing Africa by Several European powers. The Suez Canal connected the Mediterranean Sea to the Indian Ocean. An economic and political crisis in 1882 led the British to conquest Egypt. France also followed the example of Britain when Egypt fell in debt-driven by modernization projects in the country.
1. Brahmin
2.Kshatriya
3. Vaishya
4. Sudra
The Brahmin were the most powerful
(I'm pretty sure this is right)
Transaction exposure deals with cash flows that result from existing contractual obligations.
The degree of uncertainty that businesses engaged in international trade must deal with is known as transaction exposure. It is also known as translation exposure or translation risk .
It is specifically the risk that exchange rates will change after a company has already committed to a financial obligation. These foreign enterprises are extremely vulnerable to changing exchange rates, which can result in significant capital losses.
Transaction exposure often carries only one side of the risk. The only company that might experience this vulnerability is one that completes a transaction in a foreign currency.
To learn more about transaction exposure click here :
brainly.com/question/27961879
#SPJ4
1 Throw the current policy, legal and institutional frameworks for combating corruption into the dustbin. They are ill conceived and cannot achieve their intended or presumptive goal(s).
2 Rethink the Ndegwa Report’s recommendation that allowed civil, public and state officers to engage in private business. The fight against corruption shall never get anywhere so long as we allow this conflict of interest.
3 Constitute a multi-disciplinary think tank, comprising intellectuals and practitioners from various fields, to formulate new policy, legal and institutional frameworks for combating corruption. The think-tank should be wary of an ultra-legal, linear or single-dimension approach to corruption.
4 Grant unconditional amnesty to all corrupt acts and omissions from the colonial days to date. The corrupt are too entrenched, having enjoyed unhindered access to state patronage since the colonial days. Any attempt to fight past corruption will never get anywhere. They will easily overrun the best professional teams from our State Law Office, the Police Service and the DPP. In other words, fight corruption prospectively, with effect from the date of the new policy, legal and institutional frameworks set out in
