Which of the following had the largest land-based empire in the history of the world after taking Beijing in 1215?

1 answer:

3 0

The following had the biggest land-based empire inside the facts of the arena after taking Beijing in 1215: B. Mongol Empire.

At the empire's height, Mongols controlled up to 12 million square miles. however, its reputation for brutal warfare, the Mongol Empire, in short, enabled peace, balance, alternate, and guarded travel during a period of “Pax Mongolica,” or Mongol peace, beginning in approximately 1279 and lasting until the empire's stop.

Alauddin sent a military commanded by using way of his brother Ulugh Khan and the general Zafar Khan, and this military comprehensively defeated the Mongols, with the seizure of 20,000 prisoners, who had been positioned to die.

Mongol empire, an empire based through Genghis Khan in 1206. Originating from the Mongol heartland in the Steppe of principal Asia, by means of the past due the thirteenth century, it spanned from the Pacific Ocean in the east to the Danube River and the shorelines of the Persian Gulf in the west.

Learn more about Mongol Empire here: brainly.com/question/17835217

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

Describe six basic factors, or characteristics, of business.<br> HELP

morpeh [17]

1. Economic activity in the distribution of commodities and the productions.
2. Trading which is the buying and selling of goods.
3. Continuation of the process of production and selling.
4. Gaining profit by increasing the income as compared to the expenditures of the production.
5. The risk associated with the uncertain situations in the business.
6. Creative and dynamic nature maintenance, with the adoption of new policies and approaches to stay and grow in the market.

6 0

3 years ago

What was the purpose of the Knights of Labor?

daser333 [38]

It was to protect its members from employer retaliation.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How were the lives of blacks in south africa restricted by the apartheid laws?

soldier1979 [14.2K]

<span>Apartheid, the Afrikaans’ word for segregation, brought white supremacy to a whole new level as the rest of the continent was decolonizing following World War II. The National Party government treated non-whites as second class citizens and in the case of Africans, non-citizens. By confining Africans to the ‘homelands’ of Bantus tans, the National Party was able to justify stripping away any basic rights Africans had in the country of South Africa. The international community refused to recognize these homelands, and pressure eventually began to build from all sides to allow equal rights for all residents of South Africa. Pressure came in the form of economic sanctions, expulsions from international organizations, and the divestment of foreign companies.</span><span />

6 0

3 years ago

Write a paragraph of at least 125 words that considers why D.W. Griffith's movie, Birth of a Nation, was so controversial.

Burka [1]

Answer: “Birth of a Nation”—D. W. Griffith’s disgustingly racist yet titanically original 1915 feature—back to the fore. The movie, set mainly in a South Carolina town before and after the Civil War, depicts slavery in a halcyon light, presents blacks as good for little but subservient labor, and shows them, during Reconstruction, to have been goaded by the Radical Republicans into asserting an abusive dominion over Southern whites. It depicts freedmen as interested, above all, in intermarriage, indulging in legally sanctioned excess and vengeful violence mainly to coerce white women into sexual relations. It shows Southern whites forming the Ku Klux Klan to defend themselves against such abominations and to spur the “Aryan” cause overall. The movie asserts that the white-sheet-clad death squad served justice summarily and that, by denying blacks the right to vote and keeping them generally apart and subordinate, it restored order and civilization to the South.

“Birth of a Nation,” which runs more than three hours, was sold as a sensation and became one; it was shown at gala screenings, with expensive tickets. It was also the subject of protest by civil-rights organizations and critiques by clergymen and editorialists, and for good reason: “Birth of a Nation” proved horrifically effective at sparking violence against blacks in many cities. Given these circumstances, it’s hard to understand why Griffith’s film merits anything but a place in the dustbin of history, as an abomination worthy solely of autopsy in the study of social and aesthetic pathology.

6 0

2 years ago

What was the name of the group that caused scandals during President Warren G. Harding's administration? A. Ohio Gang B. Kitchen

lora16 [44]

Answer:

The Ohio gang

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago