As a judge, i would rule in favor if Bakilana
By confiscating her password and forcing her to work for long hours, Bakilana had cause intentional infliction of emotional distress toward kiwanuka.
Bakilana has intentionally inflicted emotional distress to Kiwanuka by taking extreme/outrageous conduct such as taking her passwords and mentally abuse Kiwanuka.
But, that's being said, Kiwanuka does not present any proof about her accusation. (recording or witnesses). If Kiwanuka provide them, as a judge I will rule in favour of her. But since there is still a reasonable doubt that the accusation is false, i would rule in favor of Bakilana.
It’s the last one: democracy
In contract law, undue influence differs from duress in that duress includes improper threat which is missing in undue influence. Duress is the use of any kind of threat, force or psychological pressure in order to dominate someone and make him take decisions against his will. The two principal categories of duress are physical and economic duress.
Physical duress is when one party uses a threat of bodily harm or death to make another party agree to a certain contract. Physical duress can be inflicted on individuals as well as goods. Economic duress is when any type of economic pressure is used by a party to force the other party to enter into an illegal contract which they would not have agreed to otherwise.
Giving someone life threats if they do not perform a given task is an example of duress.
To learn more about duress here
brainly.com/question/14781717
#SPJ4
C) Farmers and the working class.
He would most likely to support the causes of that.
Answer:
Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Explanation: The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ends up protecting a variety of freedoms and rights. The freedoms and rights are mainly fundamental rights similar to those seen in other countries like the United States. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms forms a part of the Constitution of Canada as well.
