<u>Answer:
</u>
The society should be somewhat simple.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- For the society to be inclusive of all the classes ranging from lower to higher, it has to cease to be complicated.
- A highly complicated society would culminate in utter chaos and the elimination of those who are unable to sustain the complications.
- These complications might mostly be social or economic in nature.
- Though the society is already a discipline that is complicated to some extent, it should stay as it is to avoid chaos and imbalance.
Your mom is so awesome hahahahahahahahaha
The answer is dependent variable. It is something that depends on other factors. For instance, a test score could be a dependent variable for the reason that it could be altered contingent on several factors such as how much you premeditated, how much sleep you got the night earlier you took the test, or even how starving you were when you took it. Typically when you are looking for the link between two things you are attempting to look for what creates the dependent variable alter the way it does.
Answer:
From a statistical point of view, participants do not have enough information. To extrapolate statistical data, at least 30 subjects should be observed to make an inference, considering the traditional quantitative analysis and using the central limit theorem.
Explanation:
The central limit theorem, indicates that, in very general conditions, if Sn is the sum of n random independent variables and of not null but finite variance, then the function of distribution of Sn approximates to a normal distribution or Gauss distribution, therefore, the number of variables is quite enough in size to establish that the sample shares “normally” a characteristic such as “being obese” in the example referred regarding the tribe on the pacific island.
The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966) required (for the first time) that someone accused of a crime be informed of his or her constitutional rights prior to interrogation. This protected the rights of the accused, or the defendant, in two new ways: 1) It educated the person about relevant constitutional rights; and 2) It inhibited law enforcement officials from infringing those rights by applying the Exclusionary Rule to any testimony/incriminating statements the defendant made unless he intentionally waived his rights.
