Answer:
concentration strategy
Explanation:
This is an approach in which a business focuses on a single market or product which allows the company to invest more resources in production and marketing in that one area.
The thing which senior managers engage in when they structure the organizational relationships to work cooperatively to achieve goals is:
- Efficiency and Effectiveness.
<h3>What is Efficiency?</h3>
This refers to the ability to perform a task or tasks quickly, accurately and with minimal error.
With this in mind, we can see that when senior managers prioritize <em>efficiency and effectiveness</em> in their organizational structure, then they would easily accomplish goals.
Read more about efficiency here:
brainly.com/question/15418098
Answer:1. The reason that the varsity team lost to JV team is lack of working together as a team.
2.Coach P. when selecting the rowers for the two teams should have looked at both the psychological(personality types and traits, if they are leader or followers etc.) as well as the physical aspect ( Stamina, Speed ,Coordination, Strength etc.) of each individual.
explanation:
1:Even though the varsity team consisted of the best individuals for speed , strength, coordination and endurance, they lacked the cohesiveness to perform as a unit. Each of the eight individual rowers had to be single-mindedly attuned to one another in order to synchronize their rowing and perform in unison. Unfortunately, the team also too many disruptor and lacked a leader.
2:The Coach should have experimented more by creating different scenarios to see how well the individuals responded and performed to one another in different situations when it came to a team environment. For example, putting the rowers in total control of the team's dynamics is the best hands on lesson they could ever experience. This would have allowed the rowers a deeper understanding what it take to be winner from a loser.
3.Coach P. should switch both the teams for Tuesday since after extensive observations and evaluation he has witnessed JV work as a better team. The JV team possessed better synergy, synchronization, and shared a common goal causing them to win more frequently than the Varsity team, despite the fact that the Varsity team had better individual members. In addition, there has been a precedent for switching boats. During the mid-1990’s, the Cornell Coach faced asimilar situation as Coach P. and as a result of him making the switch, both the JV and Varsity teams ended up winning the Eastern Championships. This demonstrates that it is more likely thatthe teams will win if they agree to switch. Moreover, even if Coach P. decided not to switch the teams, it would have taken quite a while to rebuild Varsity’s team structure, morale, and overall team synergy, implying that they probably would not have been ready in time to compete and win the race as the Varsity team anyway.
Answer:
Correct Option is B) Rochester Income Increase, Reedsburg Income No effect
Explanation:
As per IFRS,
When a company holds share of any company up to 20% then it is an associate, and in this case Rochester holds only 15% and thus will increase its net income with dividend received. (Cost method is followed)
When a company holds more than 20 % and less than 50% then the equity method is followed until and unless major significance is not exercised, generally it is exercised. In that case equity method is followed, and any income received is adjusted from cost of investment, and do not form part of income.
