The Compromise came to coalesce around a plan dividing Texas at its present-day boundaries, creating territorial governments with "popular sovereignty", without the Wilmot Proviso, for New Mexico and Utah, admitting California as a free state, abolishing the slave trade in the District of Columbia, and enacting a newThe Compromise of 1850 was a package of five separate bills passed by the United States Congress in September 1850, which defused a four-year political confrontation between slave and free states on the status of territories acquired during the Mexican–American War (1846–1848). The compromise, drafted by Whig Senator Henry Clay of Kentucky and brokered by Clay and Democratic Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois, reduced sectional conflict. Controversy arose over the Fugitive Slave provision. The Compromise was greeted with relief, but each side disapproved of some of its specific provisions:
Texas surrendered its claim to New Mexico as well as its claims north of 36°30'. It retained the Texas Panhandle, and the federal government took over the state's public debt.California was admitted as a free state, with its current boundaries.The South prevented adoption of the Wilmot Proviso that would have outlawed slavery in the new territories,and the new Utah Territory and New Mexico Territory were allowed, under popular sovereignty, to decide whether to allow slavery in their borders. In practice, these lands were generally unsuited to plantation agriculture, and their settlers were uninterested in slavery.The slave trade, but not slavery altogether, was banned in the District of Columbia.A more stringent Fugitive Slave Law was enacted.The Compromise became possible after the sudden death of President Zachary Taylor, who, although a slave owner, wanted to exclude slavery from the Southwest. Whig leader Henry Clay designed a compromise, which failed to pass in early 1850 because of opposition by both pro-slavery southern Democrats, led by John C. Calhoun, and anti-slavery northern Whigs. Upon Clay's instruction, Douglas then divided Clay's bill into several smaller pieces and narrowly won their passage, over the opposition of radicals on both sides.
The process of fostering and enhancing the knowledge, talents, procedures, and resources that enable communities and organizations to endure, adapt, and prosper in a world that is undergoing rapid change is known as capacity-building.
<h3>
What are the benefits of capacity building?</h3>
The reduction of an excessive reliance on outside experts as information, resources, and answers to community concerns is a key goal of capacity building strategies. Building capacity encourages locals to take action on local issues themselves by preventing a dependent relationship on outsiders from developing.
<h3>
Why is capacity building important in public health?</h3>
The effectiveness of capacity-building activities can be shown in the improvement of knowledge, competence, self-efficacy (including confidence), modifications to practice or policy, behavior modification, application, and system-level capacity.
Learn more about capacity building: brainly.com/question/15134241
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is b. moderate and positive.
Explanation:
Organizational commitment is a term that refers to how deeply commited or attached a person is to an organization. This notion is used in business organization theory to study how workers relate to their place of work, and to find ways to improve morale, loyalty, and performance. There are two ways in which leaders inside an organization can exercise their leadership: power, that is, the formal position of a leader within the organization's hierarchical structure, and influence, which refers to the informal leadership exercised by a leader over the rest of its colleagues. This last type of leadership can come from the personal charisma of leaders, because of their seniority, because they're respected, etc. <u>A leader who holds both formal power and informal influence, will have a moderate and positive effect over organizational commitment</u>, as employees will feel more attached to an organization when they have a leader that they respect and with whom they share a positive emotional connection.
In order to persuade people to accept their advice astrologers use the following techniques:
- Suggestion: to convince you to believe in their predictions, they make you believe that you are about to read valuable information that can change your life forever. If you don't follow their advice, according to them, you would be missing the chance of being a successful, loved and happy person.
- Social acceptance: they give you examples of people that have followed their advice and who are now lively and happy. They even tell you how presidents, ministers and other importan authorities don not take a decision wihout consulting their personal astrologer.
- Mystery: they create a mysterious atmosphere for you to believe you are about to unveil a secret world before your eyes.
- Scarce technique: they claim to be very few the real and authorized astrologers that can tell you reliable information. This will make you believe that if you miss their advice, you run the risk of being deceived by an ill-intentioned person who pretends to be an astrologer, but is no other thing than a scammer.