1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IrinaVladis [17]
2 years ago
7

Discuss at least one advantage and one disadvantage of increasing the minimum wage. consider this action’s impact on the company

.
Business
1 answer:
KIM [24]2 years ago
8 0

A minimum wage can purpose advantage and disadvantage  price-push inflation.elevating wages reduces expensive employee turnover and will increase productivity.

Elevating the federal minimal wage to an hour is a coverage purpose for many lawmakers. growing the minimal salary is expected to lift people out of poverty and enhance work ethic, however, it also comes with many feasible negative implications, which include inflation and a loss of jobs.Elevating the federal minimal wage may even stimulate customer spending, help corporations' bottom lines, and grow the financial system it might additionally raise the overall financial system by using producing extended patron demand.

Elevating wages reduces expensive employee turnover and will increase productivity. while the minimal salary is going up, employers can obtain such benefits without being positioned at a competitive disadvantage, because all groups of their field are required to do the identical.

A minimum wage can purpose price-push inflation. this is because corporations face an growth in charges that are in all likelihood to be passed on to clients. that is even more likely if wage differentials are maintained.

Learn more about wage here:-brainly.com/question/26699459

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
during the 1970s, some economists argued that the cause of the woes of the economy were due to . a.) increase in unemployment, a
mr Goodwill [35]

During the 1970s, some economists argued that the cause of the woes of the economy was due to d.) supply shock due to issues with the supply of oil

<h3>What was the economic crisis of the 1970s?</h3>

This refers to the term that is used to discuss and describe the economic crisis that threatened to engulf the United States financial sector due to certain influences such as the 1973 oil crisis, the fall outs of the Vietnam War under President Johnson and many other factors.

Hence, it can be seen that with these factors in mind, the main argument of some economists was that the cause of the woes of the economy was due to d.) supply shock due to issues with the supply of oil as can be found in option D which is true because of the supply shock which helped to cripple the US economy.


Read more about economic crisis of the 1970s here:

brainly.com/question/1549639

#SPJ1

6 0
1 year ago
Goods and services are purchased by businesses as well as by individuals. O a. True O b. False​
frozen [14]

Answer:

true

they are e.g like our capitalists

3 0
3 years ago
Amanda is a twenty-four year old student. For two years Amanda has been going to gym and using weight equipment, stationary bicy
Marta_Voda [28]

Answer:

e. All of the other choices

Explanation:

Product liability is the responsibility that a company bears for injury caused by its products as a result of a defect.

In this instance Musclematic, has known for the past year that this problem existed, but the company took no steps to warn people who owned or used these machines of the problem.

So for any injury users have they will be liable.

If Amanda files a lawsuit against Musclematic they will have to consider:

- How this litigation will affect its goodwill

- Whether or not a settlement with Amanda is a viable option

- Whether this suit will adversely affect other business relationships

- The costs associated with litigating this claim

This is because they will most likely lose the case.

7 0
3 years ago
Who is down for talking?
hammer [34]

Answer:

bettt wassuh

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Assume that instead of distributing a stock dividend, Sharper did a 3-for-1 stock split. Required: (1) Prepare the updated stock
Ganezh [65]

Complete Question:

On June 30, Sharper Corporation's stockholders' equity section of its balance sheet appears as follows before any stock dividend or split. Sharper declares and immediately distributes a 50% stock dividend. Common stock-$10 par value, 120,000 shares authorized, 72,000 shares issued and outstanding $ 720,000

Paid-in capital in excess of par value, common stock 310,000

Retained earnings 715,000

Total stockholders' equity  $1,745,000

Assume that instead of distributing a stock dividend, Sharper did a 3-for-1 stock split. Required: (1) Prepare the updated stockholders' equity section after the split. (2) Compute the number of shares outstanding after the split. Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below. Required 1 Required 2 Prepare the updated stockholders' equity section after the split.

Answer:

Sharper Corporation

1. SHARPER CORPORATION

Stockholders' Equity Section of the Balance Sheet June 30

Total stockholders' equity

Common stock-$3.33 par value, 360,000 shares authorized,

216,000 shares issued and outstanding                  $ 720,000

Paid-in capital in excess of par value, common stock 310,000

Retained earnings                                                         715,000

Total stockholders' equity                                       $1,745,000

2. The number of shares outstanding after the split is:

= 216,000 shares.

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Common stock-$10 par value, 120,000 shares authorized,

72,000 shares issued and outstanding                   $ 720,000

Paid-in capital in excess of par value, common stock 310,000

Retained earnings                                                         715,000

Total stockholders' equity                                       $1,745,000

Authorized shares = 360,000 (120,000 * 3)

Outstanding shares = 216,000 (72,000 * 3)

Common stock par value = $3.333 ($10/3)

b) A 3-for-1 stock split means that shareholders will now have 3 shares for each share that they previously held.  Therefore, the outstanding and authorized shares will be multiplied by 3 while the stock price is divided by 3 to arrive at their values after the split.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The _____ method is a forecasting method that looks at the conditions that lead to particular weather events.
    7·2 answers
  • How does free enterprise economy's freedom of producers provide benefits for individual consumers?
    12·1 answer
  • At its $60 selling price, Atlantic Company has sales of $15,000, variable manufacturing costs of $4,000, fixed manufacturing cos
    11·1 answer
  • What does the Electronic Fund Transfer Act do?
    14·2 answers
  • A company has the following budget information: Sales: $118,800; COGS: $48,500; Depreciation expense: $1,500; Interest expense:
    11·2 answers
  • A Japanese auto company recognized the quality of air-conditioning systems that a U.S. company in Indiana successfully manufactu
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a false statement?
    15·1 answer
  • Alex Meir recently won a lottery and has the option of receiving one of the following three prizes: (1) $64,000 cash immediately
    15·1 answer
  • If you visited a doctor and the total cost of the visit was $50, but you had a $15
    14·1 answer
  • dina and charles are married, under the age of 65, and have two children under the age of 18. charles works full time and earns
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!