<span>The federal and state governments needed to repay money they had borrowed to pay for the Revolutionary War.</span>
Griswold v. Connecticut was the first case in which the Supreme Course first mentioned the right to privacy.
C, if a intellectually normal student does not follow certain procedures then the individual has a behavioral disorder.
“Crime” is not a phenomenon that can be defined according to any objective set of criteria. Instead, what a particular state, legal regime, ruling class or collection of dominant social forces defines as “crime” in any specific society or historical period will reflect the political, economic and cultural interests of such forces. By extension, the interests of competing political, economic or cultural forces will be relegated to the status of “crime” and subject to repression,persecution and attempted subjugation. Those activities of an economic, cultural or martial nature that are categorized as “crime” by a particular system of power and subjugation will be those which advance the interests of the subjugated and undermine the interests of dominant forces. Conventional theories of criminology typically regard crime as the product of either “moral” failing on the part of persons labeled as “criminal,” genetic or biological predispositions towards criminality possessed by such persons, “social injustice” or“abuse” to which the criminal has previously been subjected, or some combination of these. (Agnew and Cullen, 2006) All of these theories for the most part regard the “criminal as deviant” perspective offered by established interests as inherently legitimate, though they may differ in their assessments concerning the matter of how such “deviants” should be handled. The principal weakness of such theories is their failure to differentiate the problem of anti-social or predatory individual behavior<span> per se</span><span> from the matter of “crime” as a political, legal, economic and cultural construct. All human groups, from organized religions to outlaw motorcycle clubs, typically maintain norms that disallow random or unprovoked aggression by individuals against other individuals within the group, and a system of penalties for violating group norms. Even states that have practiced genocide or aggressive war have simultaneously maintained legal prohibitions against “common” crimes. Clearly, this discredits the common view of the state’s apparatus of repression and control (so-called “criminal justice systems”) as having the protection of the lives, safety and property of innocents as its primary purpose.</span>
Answer:
A good deed has it's own reward because it is a good deed. If you do something to help someone that makes you feel good about yourself. You don't always need to be rewarded for something you do because the idea that you helped someone in need of help should be enough. If yowalwalijg down the street and see a homeless man and you decide to give him 100 dollars that's a good deed that greatly helped him. you should be satisfied with the idea that you greatly improved someone's day even if it took your money. Let's say you were at school and you saw a kid that looked sad and was sitting alone and you go to talk to him. You don't expect anything form him or anyone your doing that beacsue your kind. That's my reason of why "A good deed has it's own reward.".
