Answer:
The unlevered value of the firm is $869325.15
Explanation:
For computing the value of unlevered firm, the following formula should be used which is shown below:
Value of levered firm = Earning before interest and taxes × (1 - tax rate) ÷ cost of equity
where,
Earnings before income and taxes are $218,000
Cost of equity is 16.3%
And, the tax rate is 35%
Now put these values on the above formula
So, the value would be equals to
= $218,000 × (1 - 0.35) ÷ 16.3%
= $141,700 ÷ 16.3%
= $869325.15
The other terms like bonds and the annual coupon should not be considered in the computation part because we have to calculate for unlevered firm which only includes equity and the bond is a debt security. Thus, it is irrelevant.
Hence, the unlevered value of the firm is $869325.15
Answer:
D. the routine service.
Explanation:
Single cost driver rate: It is a cost assigned to each unit of cost driver activity directly. Cost driver also influence other business activity and effect the total cost incurred.
In the given case, Business offer both routine and specialized service, as we know single cost driver influence driver directly, therefore, cost driver of specialized service will overprice the routine service.
Answer:
Option A. Liable, because notice to Emmett is notice to Fridley.
Explanation:
The reason is that the principle is liable for the outcome of the Emmett actions in the principle's behalf. So it is clear that Fridley is liable. The agent have to work in the best interest of its principal which means that the failure to notify the additional tax liability to Fridley was part of agent's fiduciary duty. This means that the principle can sue its agent for the consequences of not placing the sufficient care to its principle.
The Fridley is also responsible because Emmett is acting as Fridley which means the notice to Emmett is actually notice to Fridley.
Answer:
Hilary is a retired teacher who lives in Miami and does some consulting work for extra cash. At a wage of $50 per hour, she is willing to work 10 hours per week. At $65 per hour, she is willing to work 19 hours per week.
Using the midpoint method, the elasticity of Hilary’s labor supply between the wages of $50 and $65 per hour is approximately 2.37 , which means that Hilary’s supply of labor over this wage range is elastic.
Explanation:
Midpoint elasticity = (Change in labor supplied / Average labor supplied) / (Change in wage rate / Average wage rate)
= [(19 - 10) / (19 + 10) / 2] / [$(65 - 50) / $(65 + 50) / 2]
= [9 / (29 / 2)] / [15 / (115 / 2)]
= (9 / 14.5) / (15 / 57.5)
= 0.62/0.26
Midpoint elasticity = 2.37
Once elasticity is greater than 1, supply of labor is Elastic.
Can u take a screenshot of the whole question for me
