Answer:
Madison Supreme Court ruling illustrates that U.S. law cannot be enforced if it conflicts with the Constitution as per the Judicial principle known as Judicial Review.
Explanation:
Answer:
A:3, B:1, C:2
Explanation:
1. Concurrent jurisdiction: Cases involving state and federal questions and cases.
2. Exclusive state jurisdiction: Cases involving all matters not subject to federal jurisdiction.
3. Exclusive federal jurisdiction: Cases involving federal crimes, bankruptcy, patents, copyrights, trademarks, and suits against the United States.
Concurrent jurisdiction arises in cases which can be heard in more than one court, it allows more than one court the authority to hear a case, for example divorce cases can be heard in a local district level court, a family court or any one of the district courts
Federal jurisdiction arise in cases involving federal crimes, bankruptcy, patents, copyrights, trademarks, and suits against the United States.
Exclusive state jurisdiction arises in cases not subject to federal laws but state laws
Answer:
The 13th Amendment supposedly ended chattel slavery in the South, but the South managed to limit these actions in the following ways. The 13th Amendment allows involuntary servitude if convicted of a crime, so this served as a loophole in the amendment. The Southern whites also created "black codes." This led to new types of offenses for not showing proper respect to white people or malicious mischief. However, these offenses could range from a felony to a misdemeanor. Therefore, several black people were wrongly convicted of "crimes."
Explanation:
Natural barriers isolated China from the rest of the world. This caused communication and interaction from different civilizations to occur. However, this also allowed China to be more protected from its enemies.
