Answer:
androgynous characteristics.
Explanation:
An androgynous characteristics of a person are defined as the person having a high tendency of having both masculine and feminine traits i.e instrumental and expressive traits.
Example: A masculine individual will rank high on masculine (instrumental) traits and low on feminine (expressive) traits.
Psychological androgyny describes the women and men who exhibit both feminine and masculine attributes.
According to researcher Sandra Bem, these parents are encouraging their children towards androgynous characteristics.
<span>Mongolia is doing well as whole. As a matter of fact, Mongolia was richer than China before 1980s. The problem came where the USSR collapsed which Mongolia had a lot of trade with. It took them over 15 years to recover. Now their biggest trading partner is China</span>
Your answer is A. Qur' an but you can say Quran as well. I hope this helps! ^^ if you need any help at all with questions like these please ask and I'll gladly help. Hope you have a great rest of your day! :)
In regard to specificity vs. population coding, most researchers conclude that specificity coding determines basic taste qualities, and population coding is important for discriminating subtle differences.
Population coding is the quantitative study of the methods or representations the brain employs to aggregate and assess the signals received by various neurons.
Sweet, sour, salty, bitter, and savoury are the basic tastes detected by humans. This enables us to assess if certain foods are healthy to eat or not. Chemical compounds that activate taste receptors in our mouths provide each taste. Your sense of taste enables you to appreciate a variety of meals and cuisines.
To learn more about basic taste, refer
brainly.com/question/11101301
#SPJ4
Answer:
d. Either A or C
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that Big Corp will likely win if it can establish as a defense that either Pam was denied the promotion for legitimate non-discriminatory reasons or the denial of the promotion was based on mixed motives. Any of these two defenses would tell the court that there were other reasons as to why Pam was denied the promotion and it is not due to gender, which would make Pam's argument invalid.
