Research the Wagner Act and the Taft-Hartley Act. How were they different, and what was different about their goals and aims?

History

1 answer:

lakkis [162]1 year ago

4 0

The differences between the Wagner and Taft-Hartley Acts are seen in the fact that:

The former Act was aimed at mediating employee disputes while the latter was a modification to the first Act. Its aim was to ensure that the activities of labor unions were restricted.

<h3>What is the difference between the two Acts?</h3>

The Wagner Act is also known as the National Labor Unions act. It was formed as a means for employees to bring forth their complaints in an organized manner to have them sorted out.

The Taft-Hartley Act was aimed at restricting the activities of the labor unions and making them disclose certain aspects of their finances and activities. While the Wagner Act became effective in 1935, the Taft-Hartley Act became effective in 1947.

Learn more about the Wagner Acts here:

brainly.com/question/9320709

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

The dark period of Babylonian captivity is referred to as The____<br> Diaspora<br> Plz Hurry

Roman55 [17]

Answer:

im in history rn i can help?maybe

Explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

What is the Piedmont?

madam [21]

Explanation:

The Piedmont is a plateau region located in the Eastern United States. It is situated between the Atlantic coastal plain and the main Appalachian Mountains, stretching from New York in the north to central Alabama in the south.

4 0

2 years ago

To what extent was the reconstruction of the south successful?

inn [45]

Well the South remember seceded completely, meaning they weren't part of the United States at all. Reconstruction allowed them back in, along with help from the 10% plan. The plan allowed the states and their governments back in as long as 10% of the population swore allegiance to the Union.

7 0

3 years ago

[25 POINTS]"I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any for

Annette [7]

The answer is D
hope this helps.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What was the<br>significance of the<br>Supreme Court's<br>decision in Gibbons<br>v. Ogden?

Bond [772]

it was a landmark decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, granted to Congress by the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, encompassed the power to regulate navigation Hope this helps !!!

3 0

3 years ago