We
can define the reasons that why United states have a bicameral congress in historical, practical and theoretical way. If we look
at the historical reason we see that the British Parliament had consisted of
two houses since the 1300s, and if we see practically, the Framers
had to make a two-chambered body to settle down the conflict that is between
the Virginia Plan ( in this plan, there are two houses of congress and the
population will determine the representation in each house) and the New Jersey
Plan (in this plan there is a single house of Congress and each state would have
an equal vote) <span>at Philadelphia in 1787 and theoretically the farmers
preferred a bicameral congress in a way that one house of congress would have
check on the other house.</span>
10%= Just drop out brother
Zinn said that study of history should be done from the point of view of the common man. It should not be done from the point of view of the historians or the politicians.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Zinn thought that the way we study history is very boring and that we have been bent under the heavy weight of the history books which lean up on us. They have set from the point of view of the historians and the politicians. This makes it very boring for us to read this subject.
History should rather be studied from the point of view of the common man so that they can understand it better because through this way they can related to it in a better way. When it is told in the form of a story, the interest of the people increases.
The Anit - Fedralists supported a strong Central Governement. While the Fedralists supported weak Central Government.
